User talk:Mariavite

Welcome!

Hello, Mariavite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Biblbroks 's talk 09:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mariavite! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 291 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Hilarios Karl-Heinz Ungerer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Independent Catholic Apostolic Church of Brazil

The article Independent Catholic Apostolic Church of Brazil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No proof of notability, no ref's at all.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 09:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chiesa Vetero-Cattolica Italiana

The article Chiesa Vetero-Cattolica Italiana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This alleged organisation has no secondary RS to support its existence, and none has been added in the 15 years of existence of the Wikipedia article.
The article claims without any source that this groups has been existing for more than two centuries, which seems false to me as in this case there would be many secondary RS discussing this denomination; however, only one such RS mentions this group, the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Centro studi sulle nuove religioni, 2001) which states the 2-century existence of the organisaton is a claim and not a fact. I found no other RS on Google Books and Google Scholar which even mention this organisation, and found respectively two and one mention(s) in total of this organisation on those databases. This organisation clearly does not meet WP:NCHURCH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Veverve (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chiesa Vetero-Cattolica Italiana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chiesa Vetero-Cattolica Italiana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiesa Vetero-Cattolica Italiana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Veverve (talk) 17:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scilla Sclanizza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scilla Sclanizza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scilla Sclanizza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southati (talk) 11:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]