User talk:Mariannan

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Mariannan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FFU request

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, mabdul 20:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Jeff G.. I noticed you recently removed some content from an article without explaining why. In the future, it would be really helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, and we care a lot about the quality of the encyclopedia. Please help us make it better! Thanks, — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 20:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Want some help?

Hello, Mariannan, It looks like you've been template bombed. If you'd like some help figuring out what's going on, you can ask here. I suggest you don't create any more new articles in this series until things get ironed out. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I need some help. So I understood.

OK, first step (it's important): don't remove the WP:AFD tags from the top of the article. They are a notice of a discussion that you cannot close by yourself. If you remove them again, someone is going to block your account from editing, for disruption. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ok. I won't do this again. I swear. No more removing the WP:AFD tags.

Your promise seems somewhat lacking in weight "Understood. No more this, I swear. [[User:|Mariannan]] (talk) 4:40 pm, Yesterday (UTC−5)" Gaijin42 (talk) 14:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine! This is my last warning. I will not remove the WP:AFD tags never again.

Second thing: The AFD discussion will last 7 days, so don't panic. Read the AFD notice someone left on your page (I think you removed it, but you should look at it and read it), then calmly participate in the discussion there. That's where it will be decided whether to keep these articles, or whether to redirect them to the article about the series, or create a new "List of.." article. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Last thing for now: I am not going to be around much this weekend, but I'll check in if I can to see how things are going. If you need an explanation of something, look at your welcome message above for how to use the {{helpme}} tag. Or find the most polite person to comment at the AFD, and ask them. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. But can you check Vitamin Pink? I think there's an error. 13:56, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

What error is that? --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Laugh track option. 14:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, the problem is that none of this is sourced, so there's no way for me to check if it's correct or not. You should probably spend some time looking for sources WP would consider reliable (if they exist), and mention them at the AFD discussion. Otherwise, from the way the AFD is going, I think the articles are probably going to be replaced with redirects to the article on the series. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess so. I better fix that error. I understood. 14:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

What am I doing wrong? Say it!

what you are doing wrong

I have tried to talk to you several times, and you have deleted all warnings, and attempts at communication. You have now violated the 3 revert rule, by reverting my changes 4 times. Your articles were redirected by consensus via the AFD process. You keep unoding that. That is what you are doing wrong. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete those shorts that I've made, so no one won't know it. And then I'll begin a new arcs without messing around.

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.

I'm doomed! What should I do? At this rate, I'll be block forever! I want to be a Wikipedia editor, not to mess around!

1) stop making reverts of the redirects that were done. 2) stop deleting attempts to communicate with you from your talk page. 3) On your most recent revert, revert your own change, as a sign of good faith. any block you recieve as a result of this is likely to be temporary, as long as you have good behavior going forward. However, you have a very bad track record of being warned repeatedly, and then doing the same behavior again (Like deleting the AFD templates repeatedly) Gaijin42 (talk) 17:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are revert and redirects? But how will I make my own arc?

A redirect is making one page automatically go to another. For example, an individual episode article being redirected to the show/series article. A revert is undoing someone elses changes. Wikipedia has a 3 revert rule, meaning you are not allowed to undo changes on an article more than 3 times in 24 hours, to prevent edit warring. You can make your own articles, but in the case of these episode/short articles, the AFD process determined that they are not noteworthy on an individual basis, and should only have the series articles for now. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

episode/short articles

So, You clearly have a passion for this topic. That is a good thing. Create a section in each of the "show" pages, with a summary of each episode/short. The problem we have with the mass articles you created is that they had all the same content, that shows that the notability is at the series level, and not the short/episode level. If individual episodes are notable, by being referenced repeatedly in other movies/shows, or receiving significant individual discussion (as opposed to the series getting discussion), then that individual short may be able to be expanded into a full article. However, thus far they are all the same. Add the details into the series articles for now. Ask if you have questions or are confused, but don't just undo what other people are doing, we are doing it for a reason. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete these articles I've made wrong, please? And I will make a better ones. What will happen if these articles shorts/episode are the same? Are they going to be deleted?

As far as I am aware, at the current time, all of the articles are currently redirected to the series articles, so no further action needs to be taken. If you create brand new articles , each one would be evaluated on its own to see if it meets WP:42 rules about notability, reliability, etc. If you recreate one of the articles you have already created, you are going to have to make a fairly strong case to override the existing consensus that those articles should not exist. It would be best to do that by getting pre-approval for those articles by starting a discussion on the talk page of the series. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:25, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will forget about "Create a section in each of the "show" pages, with a summary of each episode/short. The problem we have with the mass articles you created is that they had all the same content, that shows that the notability is at the series level, and not the short/episode level.". I don't know if I will be able to recreate them once again. What about "Say Cheese, Please" and Can-Can-Canadian" I've made? Are they good enough?

Dont forget to sign your comments with four tildes. In my opinion, those two articles should also be redirected, but they were not noticed by the previous articles for deletion process. I dont understand what you mean by "I will forget about create a section". Do you mean you find that suggestion unacceptable? Gaijin42 (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got it. Now I'm on my way!

So I see you re-re-reverted the aardvark article again. I think you are either still confused about what is going on, or intentionally ignoring policy. Can you talk a bit about what your intent is in putting that page back? Gaijin42 (talk) 19:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've changed some errors. So is this not enough?

The problem with the articles is not "errors", it is that the episodes are not Notable. please read that link and make sure you understand it. Also please understand WP:NOTINHERITED. Unless you can show that individual episodes are notable (by people discussing or referencing that particular episode, not the entire series), then we shouldn't have pages about those episodes. The only information about that individual episode is the very short plot summary, and the infobox. That is not enough unique information for an article, especially if you want an entire series of articles about each episode. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now I get it. But Summary, you said? I'll do it right away.

What I am suggesting : Add plot summary infomation for every episode, to the main series article. Not to the articles for each episode. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Summary plot for the Aarvark has been added.

You do not understand, or are intentionally trolling me. The summary belongs in the series page, not in the page for each episode. there should not be a page for each episode. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I get it. The summary belongs in the series page, not shorts. Summary of the shorts are...

Orphaned non-free image File:Islecaprice.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Islecaprice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Antfromuncle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Antfromuncle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bombvoyage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bombvoyage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sicquesicquesicque.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sicquesicquesicque.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Apesuzette.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Apesuzette.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sweetsourdough.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sweetsourdough.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scratchtiger.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scratchtiger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saycheeseplease.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saycheeseplease.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:59, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dunebug.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dunebug.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Antsinpantry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Antsinpantry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mumbojumbo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mumbojumbo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Donthustleantmuscle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Donthustleantmuscle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Neverbugant.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neverbugant.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lequietsquad.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lequietsquad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lecoponlerocks.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lecoponlerocks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Technologyphooey.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Technologyphooey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:24, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Pink Panther Show, you may be blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:05, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Pink Panther Show, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring using also an IP and disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tikiwont (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 19:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article User talk:Mariannan. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Creating fake unblock request forms impersonating an admin will not be tolerated. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mariannan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Mariannan (talk) 16:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - no reason given -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:54, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock reviewed | 1=your reason here [[User:Mariannan|Mariannan]] ([[User talk:Mariannan#top|talk]]) 18:06, 4 December 2011 (UTC) | accept=accept reason here [[User:Mariannan|Mariannan]] ([[User talk:Mariannan#top|talk]]) 18:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)}}

No, you can't accept your own unblock requests! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look, it's really not that hard. What you need to do is add the following text at the end of this page...

...except where it says "Your reason here", substitute that with your explanation of why you should be unblocked. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:20, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Mariannan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I want to be unblockedMariannan (talk) 18:23, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

accept reason here Mariannan (talk) 18:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NO! Read what I have told you, above - if you do this one more time, your Talk page access will be revoked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT use the {{unblock reviewed}} template - that is for the use of the reviewing admin. And you will need a much better unblock reason than "I want to be unblocked" -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:31, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But how will I use unblock reason template?! I don't know!

I have already explained that what you need to do is add the following text at the end of this page...

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

...except where it says "Your reason here", change that to explain why you should be unblocked. DO NOT then change it to {{unblock reviewed}} - I really cannot explain it more simply than that. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mariannan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Mariannan (talk) 18:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline yet again - no reason given -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:52, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked - if you wish to appeal further, you will need to contact WP:BASC -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:51, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Antfromuncle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Antfromuncle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Antfromuncle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Antfromuncle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:05, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saycheeseplease.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saycheeseplease.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:01, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canadian Can-Can for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Can-Can is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Can-Can until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Antandaardvark.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Antandaardvark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]