User talk:Maria Jackson

Welcome

Hello, Maria Jackson! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! E Wing (talk) 03:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Taseer Bashir. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 07:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have made major changes on your advice. An abstract is as below:

single source Now there are large no. of wikis internal citations and 12 external citations within the body of the text and 23 external source references, most are DIRECTLY related to this specific article.

peacock terms Words like distinguished, exceptional, outstanding, reputable and eminent, etc. have been removed.

original research As above, new references have been added pointing to the hardcopy or online sources.

copy editing Further effort has been made to improve the text. Feel free to help improve as skies are the limit regarding quality of the language.

copy editing The article has been further cleaned up and expanded - almost three times the size of the previous article and sub-headings added etc. l ead section. Lead section has been added.

Please feel free to help improve 'copy editing'. Please also remove the edit notes where appropriate at the top of the previous version of the article that you entered. many Thanks --Maria Jackson (talk) 12:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further refs/citations added: added dictionary link and ref. for the claim of obtaining Dr Rer Nat., added refs (newspaper reports) for the claim 'Taseer is a humanitarian worker who contributed towards tacklin..' --Maria Jackson (talk) 01:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think its ok. You may leave it as-is and let the (more experienced) others do the clean-up and such. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 08:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I will leave the cleanup tag as you advised and continue with my own clean-up process that I left to the last. Many thanks for your assistance.

--Maria Jackson (talk) 10:07, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taseer Bashir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taseer Bashir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taseer Bashir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 07:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]