User talk:MariaHickment13

This account is a suspected sockpuppet of MariaJaydHicky (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hi, MariaHickment13. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Ruby Murray 18:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Unapologetic, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Ruby Murray 18:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Unapologetic has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Unapologetic was changed by MariaHickment13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923891 on 2013-11-14T18:30:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:30, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Unapologetic. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ruby Murray 19:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Ruby Murray with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]