User talk:Margerypark

Welcome!

Hello, Margerypark, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

Alzira Peirce

Before I take this matter to the noticeboard as a matter of edit-warring, I suggest you specify, either here or on the Alzira Peirce talkpage, what specifically is factually incorrect about my edits. I assure you I am more than willing to admit my mistakes and more than willing to work collegially with you on this. From what I can tell you have removed text and replaced some or most of it with a promotional, resume-style text, which is unacceptable. I recommend you not revert my edit again because (and I must warn you out of fairplay, that you would be in violation of WP:3RR, which prohibits more than three reverts in any 24 hour period, which will incur an editing block, especially since I have advised you of this.

I am adding the welcome above, despite the fact that I am a little peeved, so that you can read up on what you need to learn about how to edit and remain an editor in good standing on Wikipedia, if that matters to you. Perhaps between now and tomorrow, when you will doubtless return, you will have read the above (in the welcome message) suggested reading material on editing and we can work together collegially, once you explain what is incorrect besides your claim that I confused her father and grandfather. I have to check that out, but if I did I am always willing to acknowledge any error or mistake I make. We are all human. Quis separabit? 18:30, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

This report can be found at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Margerypark reported by User:Rms125a@hotmail.com (Result: ). Not to be confused with the second report mentioned below. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Margerypark reported by User:Amortias (Result: ). Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 19:27, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Margerypark. If you are hoping to improve articles you are going about it in a strange way. You've charged a possible collaborator with vandalism here. If you want to keep your editing privileges it would be to your advantage to respond at WP:AN3 and agree to wait for consensus before reverting again. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:59, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add my 2 cents as well. I came within a hair's breadth of blocking you. The only reason I didn't was because you didn't revert after Ed's warning and because the article was locked by another administrator. If I see this kind of disruptive behavior by you on this or any other article, or the unfounded personal attacks, you risk being blocked without notice.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rms125a@hotmail.com's vandalism

This article has been repeatedly vandalised by Rms125a@hotmail.com. who appears from this and other discussions to be an obsessive compulsive individual with a record of anti-Catholic bigotry (not an issue in this instance). Rms125 has deleted properly researched contributions with unfounded and poorly written passages of which the misidentification of Alzira's paternal grandfather as her father is only one. This is the kind of action that render Wikipedia suspect. A pity.Margerypark (talk) 15:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Your above comments about another editor, including 'obsessive compulsive' and 'anti-Catholic bigotry', cross the line into personal attacks. If you don't plan to observe Wikipedia's behavioral norms you probably shouldn't be editing here. EdJohnston (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want nothing further further to do with Wikipedia and have advised all students in my university classes to desist from contributing to a forum whose administrative editors are incapable of distinguishing between properly researched contributions and contributors who would fail any university course.Margerypark (talk) 17:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Margerypark, I've removed the section you added below. If you add anything similar to that again, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]