User talk:Margaret Habibie

Your edit on Yuzuru Hanyu

Firstly, I'm thankful for the addition you brought to Yuzuru Hanyu which I assume you did in a good faith. However, Hanyu being regarded as one of the greatest skaters have been mentioned once in the lead and has been explained in the body, specifically under the Skating Technique and Awards and Honors section. Most of the references cited by you have been used in the article, and I have added the new ones to support the relevant statements. So, it's very unnecessary to keep adding the new paragraph in the lead. I hope you'll understand that and cease adding the paragraph so editors won't need to keep reverting your edit. Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 00:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you haven't stopped, I need you to understand that the statements you've added aren't true either. Hanyu is not the greatest male figure skater. Even in the references you used, not all of them say so, there are some who say he is, others say he is one of the greatest. Writing "one of greatest, if not the greatest, male figure skater" (which was there last year) is too wordy grammatically, so it's cut to "one of". And there is nothing saying he is "an icon and most well known figure skater worldwide" in the reference you cited. So, please revert your edit, because this is such a misinformation. - Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 08:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yolo4A4Lo, please address article content issues on the article's talk page, not on individual users' talk pages. You may like to rephrase the concerns in a way that does not directly address a specific editor when you do. Afterwards, feel free to invite Margaret Habibie, who can still edit the article's talk page, to the discussion. {{Please see}} could be helpful. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Lcodyh803. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Yuzuru Hanyu seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lcodyh803 (talk) 02:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Yuzuru Hanyu) for a period of 3 months for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On Yuzuru Hanyu

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Yuzuru Hanyu § "The Greatest" or "one of the greatest men's singles skater"?. Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Margaret Habibie! Your additions to Evgenia Medvedeva have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:27, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]