User talk:MargaretGSinnoh

May 2022

Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rugby services, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If this was announced on Twitter, you need to include a link to the tweet where they said it. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MargaretGSinnoh, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi lord Belbury, is there a way I can screenshot and post it to you as it is a DM on twitter MargaretGSinnoh (talk) 18:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, per WP:PRIMARY. Since this also looks like block evasion on behalf of User:Beanieshark22 I'm going to just take it out of the article. --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi lord belbury,

The source that I got for the largest and smallest moto in the UK is on a Twitter DM from the official Moto account. Is there a way I can screenshot it and send it to you so I can prove it's a reliable source please.

Thanks for considering.

Margaret Green MargaretGSinnoh (talk) 19:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't listen the first time. And why are you using your real name to sign your comments CreecregofLife (talk) 19:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I got the source where I got the information from. If yow want me to I send you a link to the proof of the infomation.

MargaretGSinnoh MargaretGSinnoh (talk) 19:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anything given in a private message on social media is completely unusable on Wikipedia. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 19:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beanieshark22. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —C.Fred (talk) 19:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MargaretGSinnoh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I got the source for the edits on rugby services. https://www.flickr.com/photos/195516448@N05/52083470890/in/dateposted-public/

Decline reason:

Block evading sock. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:58, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MargaretGSinnoh (talk) 19:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw you post that link on your sockmaster account, Beanieshark22. —C.Fred (talk) 19:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You’re not listening, and that’s not a reasoning for you to be unblocked, especially on sockpuppeting charges CreecregofLife (talk) 19:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]