User talk:Marcus Sherwood-Jenkins

Proposed deletion of Victoria janushaita

Hello, Marcus Sherwood-Jenkins. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Victoria janushaita, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Helenabella (Talk) 17:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Victoria Janushaita for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victoria Janushaita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Janushaita until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Renata (talk) 03:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Nomination

Thank you so much for your message on my talk page; it is lovely to hear from you. I think you may have missed a couple of small things in the notice, and in the information I left on your talk page, so I'll see what I can do to help. Firstly, you can find the explanation for the recommendation for deletion on the template I included at the top of the page. (If you ever prepare an article and find it is nominated for deletion, the template at the top of the page is a great place to start to work out what you can do to improve the article!)

Secondly, I certainly didn't destroy your work, and indeed, see the page is still live at the the time I am writing this. It would be a violation of Wikipedia's guideline's to do so, not to mention very disrespectful to you. If the page has been blanked at any point between my edit and the current version, you may wish to take it up with the person who did so, as that is certainly inappropriate behaviour.

Lastly, I won't go into it in detail here (as mentioned in the notice at the top of the article) the appropriate place to debate reasons for deletion is at the relevant discussion page. However, as noted, I put the article on the nomination list due to the fact that it did not appear to meet WP:GNG - WIkipedia's notability guideline. If information demonstrating her notability is available, please do make the case for it on the discussion page, as it would be awesome to see content developed on a relatively unknown but notable woman. Helenabella (Talk) 07:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to add, as I mentioned on the article's talk page, I personally think it's really well written, even though the subject may not meet the threshold for an encyclopaedic subject. Do keep contributing your writing skills Wikipedia! Helenabella (Talk) 07:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]