Jump to content

User talk:Marco Chemello (WMIT)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re orphan article

[edit]

Hello Marco, Just added a link from the page Business model to this new one. Also did the same in the Portuguese version. Best regards, Luis

Dear @Luisaugusto.polimiit:, t.hank you. Please remember to add your signature to your messages (see Wikipedia:Signatures). --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 14:30, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicolò Tron (diplomat), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao

[edit]

test many thanks --CPadovani (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?

[edit]

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84462604.pdf states that File:Collina presso Nagasaki, bozzetto di Alexandre Bailly, Michel Jambon per Madama Butterfly (1906) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000079.jpg is by Marcel Jambon, not Michel Jambon as the file upload states. Is this a typo in the archive? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 20:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, as you may have seen on WT:OPERA, I'm at four restorations from the drop, which I don't think is bad after three days. Threw Puccini and Rosa Raisa up on FPC. Want to wait on Madama Butterfly until the above's resolved, and I'm waiting for Gabrielle Ray to be in the article a little longer. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 06:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: Thank you! I informed the Archivio Ricordi staff about your work - they are grateful and they are verifying the information about Jambon. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 08:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden: Thank you for the tip, I just corrected the typo. --LutiV (talk) 09:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done @Adam Cuerden and LutiV: Fixed metadata on Commons and renamed files. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 09:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Glad I could help! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 23:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Been doing a second pass over the images, and have a few comments, if you don't mind.

First off, Documentation:

It'll help usage if we can be as sure of what we have as possible.

Secondly, on a different topic, File:Walküre (Waltraute) (mezosoprano), figurino di Carl Emil Doepler per Die Walküre (1876) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON003994.jpg. I believe this is from a book of Doepler's designs. If you can get me the complete set, I will promise you to restore every single one. It's a project I've wanted to do for a while, but a bunch of the files cut off the edges of the artwork - I remember the one for the dwarves was rather bad in that respect.

Thirdly, and this is probably more of a "me" problem - I've promised myself to do at least 50% female-related restorations. This does not include fictional women, but can include costume designs for named actresses, or anything designed by a woman. If you have anyhthing like that, it would be appreciated.

Fourthly, File:M.elle_Fonti,_figurino_di_artista_ignoto_per_La_revanche_de_Candaule_(s.d.)_-_Archivio_Storico_Ricordi_ICON013578.jpg is probably from about 1869. Fonti was in the première cast [File:M.elle_Fonti,_figurino_di_artista_ignoto_per_La_revanche_de_Candaule_(s.d.)_-_Archivio_Storico_Ricordi_ICON013578.jpg], and the première was in 1869. I don't... think it was revived. The quote about it at Jean-Jacques-Joseph Debillemont does not bode well for revivals. Kind of looks like there's significant amount of the edge of the image cut off in that one as well, since there's a bit of edge sticking in at the lower left. If you're doing the scanning anew, it's probably best to include more edge - easier to crop than rescan.

Thanks, and sorry for all my rambling! Honestly, this is an amazing image drop, and please don't take my nitpicks as anything more than that. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 06:32, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps of more interest than my rambling: It looks like, at the moment, Rosa Raisa, Madama Butterfly, and maybe Puccini (it hasn't hit quorum yet) will become featured pictures tomorrow, which is a good start, no? Couple more up for voting, but think we're hitting the traditional start of University slowdown. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 06:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: Great! Thank you again. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 06:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like, of the six I've done so far, two (Puccini, Rosa Raisa) have passed, two more (Madama Butterfly and Gabrielle Ray are passing, and another two have just been nominated. I'm thinking that big group photo of Verdi next, and I think I might nominate Edgar without changes, because there really is nothing for me to do with that one. The order of completion and order of nomination is going to vary a little bit for various reasons (big one being if it's already in the article, so I don't have to wait for usage to stabilise). I'll keep it updated on WT:OPERA. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 21:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, one question, although I don't know how answerable it is: is this from La Wally's première production, or a later one? If we know the production, that tells us which actress it was designed for, which adds some value. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 21:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden: 1892 is the year of debut for La Wally, so it's the première production. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 12:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Right! Wasn't sure if there was enough time for a second to be mounted that year. Cheers! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 18:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, one last thing. Licensing. I think the license should be {{Cc-by-sa-4.0|Archivio Storico Ricordi}} - that's what I've been using for my restorations; it displays (more-or-less; Commons' version looks a little different) as:

Otherwise you get this:

Which doesn't really indicate who to credit, and it's not entirely obvious if you don't know about the collaboration. Easy enough fixed, but worth noting before the next drop. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 20:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: You are right, I'll apply your suggestion. Thank you. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 10:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to help! I really hope I'm not being a pain. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 09:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the button to save drafts in my sandbox?

[edit]

Good evening Marco, I don't know if I published by mistake what I had written in my sand box last thursday during the English class. I have a doubt about the right button I have to use to save the contents of my sandbox without publishing it in the community. You said not to use the blue buttons ... but I had already pressed the blu button on the top (on the right). In that page there are 2 blu buttons, are both wrong? (I tried to attach an image but it's quite difficult. The system blocks me) Please, could you check my sandbox and... finally what is the right botton to press when you want just to save the your draft in the sandbox? Thanks a lot.

--Pantone23 (talk)

Dear Pantone23, as I specified the only button not to press is "Submit your draft for review!". The other button, "Publish", means simply to save in your sandbox. Good work. --Marco Chemello (WMIT) (talk) 19:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabrina Fernandes (July 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Thanks for creating this draft. It seems that the subject does not meet the notability criteria for a biography on Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 13:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Marco Chemello (WMIT)! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 13:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Ciao Jaqen (talk) 10:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marco_Chemello_(WMIT)&oldid=1233295644"