User talk:Marcin kapitaniak

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Marcin kapitaniak! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Mary I of England

Dear Marcin, You've reverted more than 3 times on the same page in a 24 hour period

1st revert: 21:01 31 January
2nd revert: 15:46 1 February
3rd revert: 17:44 1 February
4th revert: 17:54 1 February

As you are a relatively new user, you may not be aware of wikipedia's editing policies, however, reverting more than 3 times in 24 hours breaches one of our behavioral rules called the "three-revert rule": see WP:3RR. I did mention this in my last edit summary [1]. You should undo your last revert and return the page to the previous revision. Secondly, you have tagged your reverts as minor. This is inappropriate; the minor tag should only be used for small typos or obvious misspellings, or reverting obvious vandalism. If you revert editors in good standing and tag that revert as minor, the other editor is likely to see it as an insult.

File:Mary1 by Eworth.jpg is an unrealistic portrait; it shows Mary as too young. At the time of the portrait she was 38. Secondly, higher definition images are generally preferred and the portrait showing her more realistically File:Mary1 by Eworth 3.jpg is of higher definition, and hence a better quality. Consequently, I think we should use the more realistic, high definition image. DrKiernan (talk) 18:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: :) I have other opinion about the portrait and their connection to reality, but since neither of us has ever seen The Queen living, so I hope we can agree on the portrait of Mary by Anthonis Mor File:Mary_I_of_England.jpg, can we?

Problems with upload of File:Coronation of Mary I.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Coronation of Mary I.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Coronation of Mary I.jpg

The file File:Coronation of Mary I.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mor,-Sir-Anthonis-(Antonio-Moro) Queen-Mary-I-1516-58-of-England.jpg

The file File:Mor,-Sir-Anthonis-(Antonio-Moro) Queen-Mary-I-1516-58-of-England.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low res, watermarked. better options at c:Category:Mary Tudor by Anthonis Mor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:53, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]