User talk:Marcell.Lovas93

Welcome!

Hello, Marcell.Lovas93!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Doug Weller talk 09:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Blood Tribe (neo-Nazi group). See WP:RSN#Gradient.com grabien.com as a source for a quote by someone in Blood Tribe (neo-Nazi group) Doug Weller talk 09:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 10:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 10:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sunny Hostin. You misrepresented what she said in the cited clip. In addition, unless independent sources have covered something she said, it isn't significant enough to mention. Schazjmd (talk) 15:04, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I almost believed my own lying eyes but thankfully you decided what is true and what is not Marcell.Lovas93 (talk) 19:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Her mention of climate change comes at 2:42. She says "maybe they want to believe that, you know, either climate change exists, or something is really going on". Schazjmd (talk) 19:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Cuomo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Czar (political term), you may be blocked from editing. -Gadfium (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was personal analysis in that sentence? Did Axios not report that Biden appointed Kamala as border czar? Marcell.Lovas93 (talk) 22:39, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still waiting for your answer Marcell.Lovas93 (talk) 21:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An editor who leaves a notice on your talk page isn't necessarily continuing to watch your talk page afterwards. If you want to get another editor's attention to a conversation, try WP:PING. (Really important point that trips up a lot of editors: the ping must be in a new signed comment. You can't add it after the fact and have it work. You'll get a notification if the ping succeeds.) Hope that helps. Schazjmd (talk) 15:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Price controls. You introduced an error with your edit here. The announcement was about banning price gouging, not price increases. Misquoting a source is a bad thing. It also does not seem to be WP:DUE. And you moved a comment away from where it was supposed to be. And it had a typo. More importantly, this seems to be a pattern of behavior. A lot of your edits get reverted, so you should reflect on why. Closhund /talk/ 17:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot ban price gouging by not blocking price controls. This is just common sense... Marcell.Lovas93 (talk) 16:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]