User talk:MarcelTheHippie

July 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:17, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MarcelTheHippie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I fully agree that this block is necessary and justified as a preventative measure due to my harassment-constituting misuse of warning templates and especially the many disruptive reverts I made within a short time period in spite of warnings from multiple editors (all of which I apologize for). Even though this block is expiring very soon, I honestly believe that it's no longer needed, as I've read over WP:Disruption and WP:DONTREVERT and am now better equipped to handle frustrating situations like this. Should they reoccur, I will leave Wikipedia, do other things I enjoy, and ONLY return once I have found a peaceful alternative to reverting. If unblocked, I'll focus my edits primarily on improving the topic of grain elevators of western Canada (which I happen to know a lot about) and will not reinstate my reverted edits without first seeking consensus or a compromise edit that addresses the concerns of both sides. Once again, I'm aware that my block is expiring soon, but I ask that you please give me another chance. I understand that any repetition of disruptive behavior after the block will result in me being blocked again with a longer duration. Thank you for your time and consideration. MarcelTheHippie (talk) 10:10 pm, 15 July 2019, last Monday (2 days ago) (UTC−4)

Accept reason:

Procedural allow as block expired. N.J.A. | talk 10:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NJA: What exactly does that mean? MarcelTheHippie (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked. Do not continue pinging admins and asking for unblock. That is perhaps a reason why unblock requests take so long as there are numerous to deal with. Happy editing. N.J.A. | talk 01:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was asking you to explain the weird reason you gave for accepting this request. Could you please tell me what "Procedural allow" means? MarcelTheHippie (talk) 03:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take no stock in the word "procedure" and you should be fine. Simply put there was no actual discretion used when making the decision to "accept" your request for unblock, because, your were no longer blocked at the time. N.J.A. | talk 15:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would you have unblocked me had I still been blocked at the time? MarcelTheHippie (talk) 15:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot say. As I said above "there was no actual discretion used when making the decision to "accept" your request for unblock". Put another way: I did not consider your request and will not do so now. If your issue is that you think the initial block was wrong, then see WP:APPEAL for your options. My advice is to leave it and move on, which is what I am doing and this is will be my last post here on this subject. N.J.A. | talk 15:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTCENSORED

I have reverted your edit to It (2017 film) because it censored the word "fucking" in a quote. Wikipedia is not censored, and as long as that quote is considered relevant to the article, it should be reproduced accurately. Regards, ST47 (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ST47: I strongly believe you made a mistake. With that said, I’m going to revert your unnecessary edit. MarcelTheHippie (talk) 16:13, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you looking to extend your block log?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:13, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]