Jump to content

User talk:Maqivi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Maqivi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! IanMurrayWeb (talk) 22:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re: "как убрать это г...но"

[edit]

Go to Preferences, Gadgets, check "Remove VisualEditor from the user interface" Cheers =) --slakr\ talk / 20:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ummayads

[edit]

your article Umayyad Caliphate does not match to Ummayads in 45 other languages128.164.157.184 (talk) 23:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Umayyad Caliphate You need a separate page for Ummayads such that you can match to the Ummayad in 45 other languages because they don't have a separate page under the title of Umayyad Caliphate 128.164.157.184 (talk) 23:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because The Umayyad Caliphate is ONLY prepared in 28 languages

Ummayads/Ummayad/Umayyads/Umayyad/Umayad & Umayyad Caliphate

Ummayads Your article Umayyad Caliphate does not match to Umayyads in 45 other languages.

Umayyad Caliphate You need a separate page for Ummayads such that you can match to the Ummayad in 45 other languages because they don't have a separate page under the title of Umayyad Caliphate . 128.164.157.184 (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hazard symbol  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 22:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Slashme. Edits that you recently made to Command Post and Khwarazmian Empire seemed to be tests. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Slashme (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand you correctly. First, redirects shouldn't normally get interwiki links, and secondly, you shouldn't need to edit the page to create interwiki links. Can you explain more clearly what you were doing? --Slashme (talk) 12:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Slashme, I'm editing meta:List of articles every Wikipedia should have/Expanded. To prevent the article from leaving the list, you need to add a link to the redirect, but the redirect cannot be added to Wikidata. To do this, I temporarily remove the redirect. It's the only way. These redirects should be added to the category Category:Redirects with possibilities and create these articles. These are important articles. --Maqivi (talk) 12:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I see the problem now. I'm asking around on IRC to see whether there's a better way. --Slashme (talk) 16:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
On the Wikidata IRC channel I just got the comment "sadly this is not recommended - there is actually a bot which periodically removes the sitelinks added in this way". You might be wasting your efforts! --Slashme (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Thank you! --Maqivi (talk) 16:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Slashme and Maqivi: I'm afraid you got bad advice from IRC. The Wikidata community held a lengthy RfC which concluded that consensus exists for sitelinks to exist which point to redirects on Wikipedia. This is an essential part of the process required to maintain links where articles across Wikipedias are not in 1-to-1 correspondence with Wikidata entities (for example both archaeology (Q23498) and archaeologist (Q3621491) are covered by the single English Wikipedia article Archaeology while the Italian Wikipedia has two separate articles). I think you'll find that there is no longer a bot task to remove sitelinks to redirects, although some editors may still remove the sitelinks through ignorance of the established consensus. --RexxS (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@RexxS: Is this method of breaking the redirect, adding the wiki page to WikiData, and then fixing the redirect, the accepted way to do this? --Slashme (talk) 18:44, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Slashme: it's the only way to do it, to the best of my knowledge. When I make the link, I have two tabs open, one for the redirect on Wikipedia, the other for the Wikidata entry. I think it's best to replace the redirect with something like "Temporarily replacing redirect to create a Wikidata link. The target article is Name of the target." and use that as the edit summary as well. If you're well prepared, you can replace the redirect, create the link and restore the redirect within a few seconds, so the inconvenience is minimised. --RexxS (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mosques in Makhachkala has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Mosques in Makhachkala has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Maqivi&oldid=1124476847"