User talk:Maplestraße

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Maplestraße (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

68.35.123.63 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "EineNeueSchuhe". The reason given for EineNeueSchuhe's block is: "Sock puppet of banned user: This user has been blocked indefinitely because the user is a sock puppet of Ichträgtkeineschuhe. Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.".

Blocking administrator: Dgies (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: A new account created on the same IP as a recurring vandal using the same name theme just as his last sock was blocked? Pass. Kuru ^talk 23:12, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does this mean I can NEVER edit??Maplestraße 00:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maplestraße (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What was it that I did to give you the impression that I am the a different user? I request that I be unblocked.

Decline reason:

You know who you are. I know who you are. This is a waste of time. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:52, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Muti

What is up with these edits you're making to these articles? The edit summaries say you are removing vandalism, but the actual edits show nothing of the kind. You are making wholesale changes to articles without providing specific references or engaging in talk page discussion. Please do not continue. Thanks, JHMM13 23:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maplestraße (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, it's not what it looks like. You see, when I started this account, I had nothing but the full intention of editing constructively. But then that jerk Ichtragtkeineschuhe took my password, hiijacked my account, and made bad edits. It's all very annoying, and there are about three dozen users who had the same experience and were ignored by Wikipedia. I ask that you may not ignore me, how many otherwise great editors must be kept off this encyclopedia just because of the ill doings of one person?

Decline reason:

Banned users may not edit. Talk page protected. — Sandstein 00:50, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.