User talk:Maowenjie

hi Maowenjie -- I see you are adding a lot of ball bearing articles, but they all seem to be from lily-bearings.com, and since that page is copyrighted we can't accept those articles in wikipedia. Even if we could, some of them are far too specific and detailed for a particular product and don't describe the bearings generally enough and with some context. I think it would be best to add detail where appropriate to Bearing (mechanical), and I guess I will tag these new articles as copyright violations, unless you have another suggestion. bikeable (talk) 16:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

linkspam

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — Graibeard 21:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cylindrical roller bearing

Your article Cylindrical roller bearing has appeared in the Dead End Pages list because it is not wikified. Please consult the Wikipedia Guide to Layout for more information on how to write a good, wikified article. I would encourage you to revisit your submissions and {{wikify}} them. Thanks and happy editing! James084 00:00, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed your article Cylindrical roller bearing further. Unfortunately, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thanks and happy editing! James084 04:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Water pump bearing

The article Water pump bearing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 21:03, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]