User talk:Manxome44

Manxome44, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Manxome44! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dinmore Hill Woods

Hello Manxome44,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dinmore Hill Woods for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. 🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 16:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dinmore Hill Woods

Hello, Manxome44. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dinmore Hill Woods, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. 🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 20:28, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dinmore Hill Woods

The article Dinmore Hill Woods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable forest/woodlands. Doesn't pass WP:NPLACE, it's not a populated place, it's a woodlands.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 21:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dinmore Hill Woods for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dinmore Hill Woods is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinmore Hill Woods until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 🔯 Sir Joseph ^🍸(talk) 21:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]