User talk:ManuelLopezz

This is ManuelLopezz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1: 10 days

Lagniappe

Whoever you are, please stop adding false "information" to the Lagniappe page. You are wasting your time because I'm just going to remove it every time you do it. It takes about 10 seconds.

Sam Jones actually had to replay nearly $10,000 in campaign contributions because of the DA's investigation.

≈≈≈≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagniappemobile (talk • contribs) 18:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DUCK sockpuppettry; account created shortly after the last BigDwiki sock was blocked, immediately installing Twinkle and editing similar subject areas as the previous sock had. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ManuelLopezz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked without any due process, no investigation, and no opportunity for a defense. The administrator who blocked did not open a sockpuppetry case and didn't request checkuser, he/she simply blocked me based on a "hunch" or suspicion without any consensus or due process. WP:DUCK requires that "Unless there is evidence which proves otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt, editors must assume good faith from others." It appears that the administrator who issued the block has an ax to grind against anyone who edits in the subject area that I was editing in, given the administrator's block history. The blocking administrator has had a history of continuing to blame random IPs and users that edit these articles as "socks" of a banned user fron years ago, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BigDwiki/Archive where another administrator wrote "After review with Xaosflux, this does not appear to be sock puppetry by BigDwiki. Closing." ManuelLopezz^talk 22:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You must be joking. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An SPI is not required when the behavioral evidence is pretty obvious. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DUCK requires that "Unless there is evidence which proves otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt, editors must assume good faith from others.". You haven't presented any evidence beyond circumstantial evidence, certainly nothing close to "beyond a reasonable doubt".ManuelLopezz^talk 22:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I agree with User:Ohnoitsjamie. I have not reviewed the CU evidence, but I also believe the block is correct. Goodbye. Drmies (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Appeal on your original account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important: Please update user script installation

Hi there, you currently have a user script installed from Anne drew Andrew and Drew. Several weeks ago, I changed my username to Anne drew, and unfortunately, due to an issue with script redirects, the scripts you have installed under my old username no longer function.

To fix this, please update your JavaScript pages (Special:MyPage/common.js or Special:MyPage/skin.js) by replacing all instances of Anne drew Andrew and Drew with Anne drew.

If any of this is unclear, please ping Anne drew for help. I apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding!

Thanks – Anne drew

You are receiving this message because you have installed one of Anne drew's user scripts. If you'd like to stop receiving notifications, you can unsubscribe here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]