Jump to content

User talk:Manoharv2001

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Bonadea. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Rajesh Khanna seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please do not add "superstar" to Khanna's name in any Wikipedia articles. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 05:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please stop inserting inappropriate language in Wikipedia articles. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 05:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Muqabla, you may be blocked from editing. Aspects (talk) 06:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raaz (1967 film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bonadea contributions talk 11:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Geniac (talk) 23:56, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rajput (1982 film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]