User talk:Manocihr

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Manocihr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Marek.69 ^talk 20:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Too be honest, I don't know anything about the People's Mujahedin of Iran, but I do know you need sources to edit articles, especially the potentially controversial edits you were making. As long as you have sources, I will not undo any of the changes you make it, so add the sources when you first edit and there shouldn't be any problem. I hope you are successful in cleaning up the page. Best wishes. JDDJS (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I could see how you might think the changes I were making were controversial - but they were in fact mere corrections of very obviously wrongheaded information. But you're right, I'll get the sources ready first, then make the edits. Cheers. Manocihr (talk) 16:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

quds day

Im cool with this, thanks. Cheers, nableezy - 08:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Manocihr (talk) 11:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Istanbul

Hallo

I reverted your edits again. The problem is not with what you wrote, but with what you removed. If something lacks source, please use the citation needed template. Thanks, Alex2006 (talk) 09:44, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then why don't you restore what you want kept, and leave what I added? Instead of calling me a vandal and edit-warring? Manocihr (talk) 09:46, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not doing any edit warring, but I find much more efficient that you add your stuff without removing other contributions instead that I waste my time trying to restore the article. Before removing things, please use the citation template and the discussion page. Cheers Alex2006 (talk) 09:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) Okay folks, please relax. Couple of things. Alessandro, I have to agree calling it "vandalism" wasn't the best thing to do; better be less quick with that charge. Second, just a note that Manocihr has reported this to ANI now. Third, I too was about to revert these changes, and I'm also not convinced the new passage you re-inserted most recently fits well there (it destroys the context for the following data-oriented paragraph, and it duplicates information already given in the "Religion" section). Fourth, you seem awfully experienced for a new user; are you a reincarnation of some older account? Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fut.Perf., I am inclined to agree on point 3, however both those sections are a mess (confused narratives), and filled with swathes of uncited data and info. On point 4, thanks! I edited for a while without registering, but I'm still learning - no I'm not a reincarnation. Manocihr (talk) 10:05, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Manocihr, I just read the wikipedia definition of vandalism, and I understand that it does not coincide with mine. So, my most sincere apologies if you felt yourself offended by my "vandalic" revert. Sorry and cheers :-) Alex2006 (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. But of course, if I think that in future your edits deserve a "normal" revert or a correction, I won't hesitate to do it and explain the reason :-)

Thankyou very much for your apology. Manocihr (talk) 15:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehen! (here comes the second language where i need help :-) ) Alex2006 (talk) 15:47, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]