User talk:Mannyboy2015

April 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ML^talk 11:48, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ML^talk 12:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Socking

Read WP:SOCK

Don't use your IP[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2605:6000:890F:5F00:5D1F:B62A:43CB:A2BB] and your account on same article. It gives the false impression that there are multiple users. Any more such abuse would get you blocked. ML^talk 12:42, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ML^talk 17:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --RaviC (talk) 12:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mannyboy2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi good afternoon to you. Thank you for your concern. I never called anyone a "terrorist."I have tried to edit some articles here categorized under Hinduism, showing some bias and favoritism. Sati and caste system was one of the major tenets of Hinduism, but comparing those to cultural discrimination of Dalit Christian seems ludicrous. Also ,under Anti-Hindu sentiment article, they cited a right wing magazine for "falsely accusing Hindus for violence against Christians." I cited credible sources such as JSTOR, not some evening newspaper articles as is often cited in some criticisms of Christian articles. But when you maintain neutrality, you should have the same for all religions or ideologies. Thanks and regards.

Decline reason:

"Just wondering or is this page hijacked by Saffron terrorists". None of the edits I looked at could remotely be considered constructive. Best we leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 20:58, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I suggest that you may possibly have not increased the likelihood of your being unblocked by claiming in your unblock request that you "never called anyone a terrorist", since anyone who spends a little time checking your editing history can easily see that you have done so several times. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:02, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]