User talk:Manny Ribera

RE:User:VidGmr

It makes me feel good that might possibly becoming a sensible editor, except for the fact that you accuse me of calling someone a bastard, which is not true. Anyways, keep it up and maybe you'll be able to continue editing. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 15:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

The bots are not attacking me. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 14:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if you use warning templates; if I haven't done anything wrong, then it doesn't matter. It looks like you won't be able to edit; you're going back to the same old stuff, Butterrum. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 14:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not doing anything wrong, so there's no reason for me to stop. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 14:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: You offend me!

You should know that the Pentagram is an ancient symbol, and is not a Devil-worshipping symbol, not to mention being as Religious as any other symbol (such as the Star of David or the Crucifix), but hell, I won't get onto that now. Either way, as much as we are all trying to help the situation, Klptyzm made the right point in saying how we should avoid posting on his talk page unless it's necessary, such as dispensing a warning or two. ≈ The Haunted Angel 16:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as it's not antagonising him or provoking him to start off again, yeah. ≈ The Haunted Angel 15:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm

I got the feeling that you might be Craxy, you pretty much said the same stuff to me as did Craxy. Sean mc Sean 05:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manhunt (game)

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Manhunt (game) are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DarkSaber2k 17:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well

I can't add you... Sean mc Sean

Oh, its Perry. Sean mc Sean 02:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For your info

soda is (or was) called pop in the uk John Hayes 11:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Eric Sparrow

If the article doesn't need to exist, then it shouldn't exist. From what I see, all this character is is a mere antagonist; all the article does is give a plot summary of the games he's in. Sorry man, but I feel this needs to be deleted. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 16:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't save it; someone just removed the tag. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 15:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GTA series gang list

Hey Manny. You wanna post in the Avening Angels heading on the discussion page for including GTA gangs in the article? I figured you would want to check to see if they fit the criteria, since you suggested including them. If you're not interested, I will do it, but I think you are better informed than I am about them. Eganio 05:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Idiotez

Manny, thanks for posting on my talk page. FYI, I'm the one who posted the Avenging Angels heading on the GTA gangs list talk page. I did so in response to your request for us to discuss their inclusion in the article. So please share your knowledge of them, and how well they fit each criterion. I left it alone specifically so you could do it because a) including them was your idea to begin with, and b) you seem to know more about them than I do. Eganio 08:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Sorry if I seemed terse, Manny. My apologies...I think I may have misunderstood your post. I just hoped that you would fill in the Avenging Angels stuff when you saw it, cuz I ain't touchin' it, since I have no knowledge of them whatsoever! Eganio 19:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Klptyzm

Just to let you know, Klptyzm's block isn't real according to the block logs and the tag was added by an annoymous IP address so it looks like someone's just trying to make trouble. Klptyzm can remove it if he wants. ●BillPP ^{(talk|contribs)} 16:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I was just trying to give you a heads up as a show of good faith, but it now turns out you're the troublemaker. By the way that "strange friendship" is actually called cooperation. You should try it one day as you wouldn't have so many problems on Wikipedia. ●BillPP ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I really hope you can stop this nonsense and actually consider editing with a little sense. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 19:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should cease making hostile messages towards other users and making sockpuppets. Stop inciting conflict. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 21:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you for 24 hours, for using an IP address to harrass another user [1], you faked a block message and used my username to do it, it is a very serious matter. When you return, please act more constructively. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was me who added the block message, not manny Ribera. 202.156.66.110 10:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked - further info at User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite -- Agathoclea 10:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my humblest appologies for blocking you, I'm pleased that it was removed in time to correct the error in your block log. I just saw your IP add the warning, but I now understand that it was not you who added it originally. It's probably best that you are aware that a user that is blocked can remove block messages themselves from their talk page (although it is fround upon, but in this case, it was a mallicious block message so the user had every right to remove it). I hope you can get back to editing now, sorry again - Ryan Postlethwaite 18:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]