User talk:Mannm5

February 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to The X Factor (U.S.). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --MSalmon (talk) 23:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to The X Factor (U.S.), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 15:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited claims

You are continuing to add uncited, unverified claims to articles including Kim Zolciak and NeNe Leakes. As you have already been warned above not to do so, an admin will be notified in you persist. I note you are making changes across a large number of articles today. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is WP:VERIFY. Please read and adhere to this bluelinked policy. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And your edit here is inexcusable. You appear to be treating Wikipedia not as an encyclopedia but as a a series of fan sites. I would ask you to consider whether you are committed to being a productive, constructive contributor to this altruistic, free encyclopedia designed to help even the poorest people have access to organized reference information. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Real Housewives of New York City, you may be blocked from editing. tedder (talk) 20:55, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The X Factor (Australia season 4). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Oz (talk) 06:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at The Real Housewives of Atlanta, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic talk! 16:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mannm5. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mannm5. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]