User talk:Manning38

Hello! This is Manning38 --Manning38 (talk) 21:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposal re: abortion is unlikely to get support since the language will be considered "too emotive" or POV. Of course this is a matter of the outlook of the participants. 50 years ago the proposal would have been standard thinking. Use of the word "baby" is, I think only standard English usage, so should appear somewhere in the article, even if Abortionists don't like it. Xandar 10:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manning38, please stop making blatantly partisan changes. Wikipedia strives to be neutral as a matter of policy. I'm going to get "Legal murder" deleted as fast as possible, and I'm sure that calling a fetus a "baby" likewise isn't going to fly. TruthIIPower (talk) 04:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the target of your redirect Legal murder to Justifiable homicide, which I think is more likely to be the article being searched for with that search term. You may also want to review our policy on neutral point of view; although it does not extend to redirects it should be kept in mind. If the term is not commonly used by multiple mainstream reliable sources for the subject, it should not be used (see Wikipedia:R#Neutrality_of_redirects for more information). --TeaDrinker (talk) 05:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia in culture. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Awickert (talk) 20:36, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of No-life

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as No-life, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 20:58, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Manning38! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 318 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Derrick Mercer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]