User talk:Manname

Unblock Request.

I was trying to contribute good way. sock puppetry in this website is trying to improper purposes include attempts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions,

unblock request.

"Improper purposes include attempts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, evade blocks or otherwise violate community standards and policies." Your original account is indefinitely blocked. --neilN ^{talk to meneiln} 22:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hey neiln, you are not doing correct. moderator in this website who ban users who contribute in good way. you are error, neiln . but still you contribute in this website many stuff. Unblock Request. manname (talk) 23:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You are right!!!! "...sock puppetry in this website is trying to improper purposes include attempts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions..."

So, what should happen?

1. Stop your socking and let us handle the other socks.
2. Continue to make accounts. We know it is you. We undo your edits. You waste many hours of our time. While our attention is on you, the other bad people hurt the articles.

Let us do our job and help Wikipedia. You are not welcome here because you socked just like the others. You socked when we asked you to stop. Now you can have no influence over the articles. We see you. We undo you. You have done this to yourself. Let us handle things. Okay? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ok http://postimg.org/image/6eby1fhn5/ . i was just trying to help. i do not understand why nieln is trying to be arrogance in my unblock request in this website. I request to unblock because i want to contribute in good way. User talk:NeilN blocked simpleabd even the edit conflict is not done and banned some of my accounts that trying to contribute in good way. sorry for any misunderstanding. manname (talk) 01:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

anna, do not make a lie to contributor? i try not to waste your time in bad way. i try not accuse any of you that you waste my time. our mistake is our mistake. we can learn from it. now you might learn anna_frod. manname (talk) 01:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manname (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry for any misunderstand. i try to use this only account in this website. i try to contribute in good way with a reliable source

Decline reason:

Per below. — daniel_case (talk) 05:21, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No misunderstanding. Refresh your memory with this. I was nice. I asked you to stop making accounts. You did it anyway. anna_frod (talk) 02:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i try to understand. i though simpleabd banned indefinitely that is why i used some of my account in a good way. i try to be calm in the edit conflict, i try not to lose my focus. unblock request. manname (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i try to understand. unblock request new.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manname (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i try not to lose my focus in edit conflict, when i see my account ban i though it doesn't unban, i though simpleabd blocked indefinitely in edit conflict that is why i used some of my account in a good way. i try to use only this account in this website. i try to contribute in a good way with a reliable source if needed. manname (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. yunshui ^雲 _水 07:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i try to understand

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manname (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i try to understand this website the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia = i try not to make account after unblock or disrespect contributor.

the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, = i try to understand my block condition.

will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and = i try not to bad sock, or bad aggressive in some article.

will make useful contributions instead. = i try to contribute in a good way with a reliable source if needed. i focus in Islamic topic. i can try to contribute in some beneficial topic. education topic i can try.manname (talk) 08:21, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

An agreement only to try not to sock is not adequate. Also, there is an obvious competence issue, given your poor command of the English language. --anth_brad^"talk" 09:46, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

the edit conflict is not done, and i trying to have good source. and i am ban, i do not know what happen.

by the way, i ban in Muhammad in Islam article because of edit conflict, that is unfair, i have source. prophet Muhammad believes in Holy Quran. it is clearly clear that in Holy Quran, There is no distinction in any messengers of ALLAH. they are completely humble submit to Oneness of ALLAH the God.

prophets of ALLAH offered daily prayers and worships in Oneness of ALLAH the God in day and night. prophet Jesus(arabic Isa)(peace and blessings of ALLAH be upon him) teached the israel to believed in ALLAH the One God. ALLAH is never trinity. ALLAH The Incomparable God never produces a child and never borns of anyone.

In the alternation of day and night is the sign of ALLAH the God for His understanding creations. manname (talk) 12:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

manname (talk) 12:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, listen carefully: Now that you are writing full sentences, it is obvious that your English is not really good enough to edit articles here. Please, leave that to the many other editors here. In the end, they get the articles right.

It is very important that you give up and do not try to edit any more. I am concerned about you, personally. As a Muslim, it is very important for you not to lie or deceive or cheat in any way. As ALLAH is watching, you must be a good person. You must resist the temptation to be dishonest in any way. Please, please, use your strength. Leave Wikipedia. Trust that the community here will help to make the articles right. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ALLAH is the Most Unique.

the Name of ALLAH is the Most Fearful Name of all. All feared Oneness of ALLAH the God. ALLAH can put us in heaven or hell or in anywhere. ALLAH the Most Gracious is give us life, imagination, thinking, existence and all which we do not know. We should praise and worship Oneness of ALLAH the God in day and night. In the alternation of day and night, We still worship Oneness of ALLAH the God. so that we can have paradise which rivers flow. stated in Holy Quran. Kindly read the first chapter in Holy Quran. you know the truth.

if you want to learn not to waste time in this website so that you can try to be good. there are good method but i try to give you method. if you have nothing to do useful in this website, log out immediately in this website and look around the wonders of ALLAH the God. we can grateful to Oneness of ALLAH the God.

i try to understand the website

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manname (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i try to understand the website. i can still try to help and contribute in this website. i can try to fix that can help people in good way. even my english is not good, i can still try. the edit conflict is misunderstand in my opinion, i have source and it is undo, i have no intend to lie. shall i lie and do bad thing? i do not want to be bad. that is all. http://quran.com/1 manname (talk) 12:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I suggest you focus on the Wikipedia for your native language, as your written English skills do not meet our competence requirements. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock request new.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manname (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i try to understand the competence. i use this only account in this website if i am unban.

i try not to sock and violate any policy in this website.

i try to contribute in good way. i contribute in Islamic topic and some topic that help people. i try to fix any bad in any topic.

maybe in competence, it is like in metric measurement like feet to meter, if you do not know the measurement, you can check the book. i can use the information in the source and i try to check the grammar and helpful and constructive information in nice way and nice manner.

sorry for any misunderstanding.

Decline reason:

Sorry, your English seems insufficient to edit here. Max Semenik (talk) 20:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note

You cannot remove declined unblocks from this page. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request new

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manname (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok, i try to understand the website. i do not want to sock and create account in this website because i already said in the unblock request.

about competence, wikipedia can be school to me, when i edit i see some information. i can learn to write good in this website.

it is not always i read article in this website because it feel nice when i contribute and read article.

unblock request.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia does not offer language classes, and it's rather obvious that your English isn't good enough to successfully contribute. Huon (talk) 23:23, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ok.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Manname (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i do not make unblock request after this.

when i mean, wikipedia can be school to me? i mean not in the moderator and not in the website.

it is because many nice people already contribute in this website.

in opinion of moderator in this website, my english is not nice. i appreciate it. i try not to take it seriously. because when i am unban, i may spend some time in this website. in my opinion, it may took 30 minute when i contribute at least 2 information.

seriously, every minute is important.

i can try to learn how to use english in nice manner.

i am gonna start in low, i try to contribute information with correct grammar and source.

i can try to fix any bad in any topic.

wikipedia is no own research i guess. i can try to get information in the source and fix any bad in any topic.

sorry for any misunderstanding.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I don't think your English language competency is sufficient. PhilKnight (talk) 21:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your own language Wikipedia

Do you see your native language Wikipedia here?

https://www.wikipedia.org/

You do not need to tell us. I am just showing you. Please consider looking at the articles you like there. See if you can help expand them. Best wishes, anna_frod (talk) 02:18, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hey anna, it is nice to be real than to be fake. thanks anyway. no human being like fake and hypocrite. i saw your comment in nieln, i am sorry anna if you really need to be fake when you do not need to. i am sorry if i misunderstand your condition. i really wanted to stay in this website and contribute in islamic topic. anyway, i can still contribute.

thanks anyway and sorry for misunderstanding. manname (talk) 09:59, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Good Job on your edits about Islam. We as Muslim really need to clean up wiki from propaganda and false things great work. Also we need to add more authentic sources.

One suggestion when writing ALLAH write it like this Allah when you write like this ALLAH it mistakenly shows yelling.

Ahmadsafi1212 (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]