User talk:Mandishaa

Welcome

Hello, Mandishaa! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:46, 26 December 2012 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

May 2018

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as W. R. Grace and Company. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

• Diannaa, this user seems to be dumping an entire SEC database into our articles as references. What to do? Drmies (talk) 00:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
• Thanks Diannaa for reminding me, I have reviewed the information you have provided. I will make sure the Wikipedia policy is strictly followed. Mandishaa (talk) 01:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
• Drmies I am adding the more detailed information with verifiable official resources to the events. The source is the most accurate information for public companies, but hard to find given huge volume of filings. Please let me know if you think this is not helpful to the community, and I will follow the advices. Mandishaa (talk) 01:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
• I do hope to contribute to the community. Diannaa and Drmies, please let me know if I can do better, thanks in advance.Mandishaa (talk) 01:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Mandishaa, this is an encyclopedia whose references should be secondary, not primary. "Official" resources really doesn't mean a lot here. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 01:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks Drmies, I might have different opinion, especially for the fact like when an corporate event happened, it should be considered as reliable resource, and there is little room to deviate as secondary source, and if you look at the reference not from official filings, you will find lot of source are purely copied from SEC filing or just press release. I still think, adding the reliable source with more background info is very helpful for readers, at least to me as an analyst of corporate finance. @Diannaa what do you think? --Mandishaa (talk) 02:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Mandishaa. Could you please explain who owns and runs secdatabase.com, what it does, and your relationship to them? --Ronz (talk) 03:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

• Hi User:Ronz, secdatabase.com company is based in Chicago, and it has the complete EDGAR database including the filings deleted/withdrew, and provide tools to research the filings. I am currently a graduate student and had been used it since 2012, The company started to build a paywall couple of years ago for certain tools. I complained about it and they opened the access to the education domain including my university's. As I have the right tool to do the research, you can see I am very efficient in finding the right information. If you think there is potential problem, I can use the url to sec site (sec.gov) and avoid the document from this site, although it could slow the process. If you want, I can send you their contact information from my college email address. thanks. Mandishaa (talk) 04:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. Sec.gov or other official websites are preferred to a site that's scraping the info. Secdatabase.com's lack of information on who they are and what they do is a huge red flag when it comes to judging the reliability of the information they provide. --Ronz (talk) 15:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Ronz. I will use the sec.gov as preferred whenever the information can be easily digged out - the problem is that sec.gov has very limited search capability which covers only filings in last four years, while secdatabase.com has powerful full-text search tools that cover full EDGAR history including many deleted filings, and secdatabase has the macro(javascript function) to auto-generate the link based on the user-defined template - it is supper convenient to create wikipedia citation text block in right format.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mandishaa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)