User talk:Mandarinrobotic

Welcome!

Hello, Mandarinrobotic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 16:21, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wish you a Good Luck

Ways to improve Arthur Drexler

Hello, Mandarinrobotic,

Thank you for creating Arthur Drexler.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

At this time this would not survive wp:afd, you need third party RS to keep this form being deleted.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 15:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Arthur Drexler

Hello, Mandarinrobotic

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arthur Drexler, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Drexler.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slatersteven (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain please what is wrong with the Dexler article, he was a very important person, see all his exhibitions, books over his tenure at the MoMA and see his obituary in the New York Times! Look forward to your comments. Mandarinrobotic (talk) 17:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)MandarinroboticMandarinrobotic (talk) 17:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there- saw the Arthur Drexler article at AFD, so I did a bit of searching, and added a couple of references I found that discuss his exhibitions, and their importance to postmodernism. Its usually better to start it off in draftspace, or a sandbox until you have built up the article with enough references to confirm notability. What you need are sources unconnected to, and independent of Drexler, so anything from Moma, or interviews etc, wont count (although you can use them to fill in bits of information as needed). You need to show that the world in general thought he was important, not just say that they did. It is usually better to avoid things like "trailblazing exhibitions that not only mirrored but also foresaw major stylistic design developments in industrial design, architecture and landscaping." unless its an actual quote, and you have cited it. The book is good- I added a google books link so other editors can check the information for themselves.

There are also these in google books - Modern Architecture and Other Essays pge 29 and chapter ten, pge 157 discuss an exhibition, [1]

and Mediated Messages: Periodicals, Exhibitions and the Shaping of Postmodern Architecture [2] from page 70 has quite a few mentions as well.

I know next to nothing about post modernist architecture, but if you need any help, just leave message on my talkpage. Curdle (talk) 11:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:T77 engine section 1934.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:T77 engine section 1934.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:T77 engine section 1934.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:T77 engine section 1934.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source added, thanks. Mandarinrobotic (talk) 12:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:T77 engine section 1934.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:T77 engine section 1934.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 10:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See the comment to the file, as the date of the image is 1934, it is out of copyright 70 years from its conception that is from 2004. The original drawing was created by the Tatra Works, Koprivnice in 1934. Mandarinrobotic (talk) 11:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Skoda Š932

Thank you for your addition to Economy car. Which issue of "The Automobile" did you find this information in. Thanks. Stepho talk 04:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Automobile, June 2023, Volume 41, Number 4, pp. 34 - 40 Mandarinrobotic (talk) 10:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Stepho talk 23:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for amending. Mandarinrobotic (talk) 07:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Škoda 932 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Škoda 932. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Škoda 932 (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Škoda 932 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) Questions? 04:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mandarinrobotic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) Questions? 04:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why it is assumed that not enough published sources/references are not included. However, I have added two additional book references published in English and also please see the recent article in English wholly devoted to the subject matter published in a very respectable 'The Automobile' magazine. I have re-submitted the draft again hoping it is acceptable. Thank you. Mandarinrobotic (talk) 08:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Škoda 932 has been accepted

Škoda 932, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 09:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, much appreciated! Mandarinrobotic (talk) 11:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]