User talk:Manchester58

February 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Rachel Viollet, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rachel Viollet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -NottNott|talk 15:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rachel Viollet, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate information

I’m trying to make this page as accurate as possible!!! Someone is posting inaccurate information. I’d like to fix it if that’s ok!!! Manchester58 (talk) 15:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, welcome to Wikipedia. That's okay, but you must make sure to source any claims you make about yourself with reliable sources otherwise it will appear as WP:Original research. What information do you believe to be inaccurate can I ask? I recommend that you read over WP:Autobiography just to be clear. -NottNott|talk 15:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rachel Viollet.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rachel Viollet was changed by Manchester58 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905527 on 2018-02-18T15:50:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article corrections

Hi Manchester58, initially you removed sourced passages in the article, and continued to add unsourced claims thereafter. I've since found references that support some of your revisions, and have added content about the film. Please understand that we can not publish information that isn't supported by WP:RELIABLE sources, and this is especially true in biographies of living persons. In the future, please offer such sources when adding content, and also be aware of our policies, including WP:COI, if applicable. A formal welcome is below. Thank you, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Manchester58, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Viollet article author

Hi, I was the one that created the biography on Rachel Viollet. I'm keen to fix any of the inaccuracies you said were in the article. Happy to assist if you'd like to detail them. Thanks. Jevansen (talk) 04:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]