User talk:Management Lifelike
October 2009
[edit]
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lifelike, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ida Shaw/Pardon the bloopers...
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Ida Shaw/Pardon the bloopers..., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Drdisque (talk) 00:12, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Your threats and User:Cameron Scott
[edit]Threats like these are uncool. Don't do that. Crafty (talk) 00:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
I consider it a legal threat - if you repeat it, I'll ask that this account is blocked. --Cameron Scott (talk) 09:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
You may wish to comment here about the legal threat you sent me. --Cameron Scott (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
[edit]
Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 18:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 19:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)