User talk:Maluka
I'm so glad you replied. I was a very good friend as well as neighbor and lyric collaborator with Mark and was very close to Henry and Bob, mostly Henry. Btw, Mark didn't have a son, he has a daughter. I'm in contact with her via MySpace and I know she'd love to have his harmonicas.
I think it's great you have the Denver history and the Oxnard/Nardcore history needs to be told. So much has disappeared online, which sucks. Henry made some great sites and told the story after Mark died. There are those still in the scene who could tell the story. In fact pictures from 'the day' have surfaced and should be seen.
I am disgusted with the so-called Agression bands that have cropped up. I won't mention names, but there's one who really galls me and everyone else.
I'll put the word out for more on the beginnings and run of Agression prior to Denver.
No drama, just sticking up for my good friends who obviously can't do it themselves.
You sound like you were a very good friend to Mark. He was lucky to have youMaluka (talk) 23:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
202.47.150.98 I'm not Mike Minnick. I am from Denver, was a good friend of Mark's, and I know the history of the band from their years spent here. In fact, I still have all of his harmonicas that he left in my car one night. I'd like to get them to his son someday. I have no problem with more info on the original lineup being added, the page doesn't really mention very much at all about the early history/members at all. I personally thought that was very weird.
I just added what I know from being friends with Mark and hanging out with the band. I didn't add that they actually lost Mike because Mark yelled at Mike's dog, all their stupid fights, Mark's severe drinking problem that eventually killed him, or that Kent used to make fun of Conrad, etc. Agression toured all through the years in Denver, and recorded two albums that aren't even mentioned anywhere. All the other histories (including the wiki) completely omit the last 12 years or so of the band's history, like the band didn't even exist. I didn't write much about Bob because I only met him once in 89 or so and I only have stories related to me through Mark that are irrelevant to the history of the band, like the Pepsi machine incident. (If you know Bob ask him about this one.)
I think "hardcore" fans would be interested in the whole history, and Denver is what I know. It's also where the band met it's ultimate demise and I think the last years are important too. If you have firsthand knowledge, or clippings, or even a good understanding of the early years feel free to add them. I think it's weird that there is so much mention of the lineups with neither founding member (Mark or Henry) starting bands after their deaths and calling themselves Agression while being completely absent for the last years of the band.
Let's not get into a battle here, add more info if you have it. A complete history would be much more desirable for all fans, and I don't have all the info. If you do, PLEASE add it. I started my edit so the early history could be easily slipped in right above the Denver years.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bitfi3nd (talk • contribs) 03:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Nardcore.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Nardcore.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm sorry to give your image a hard time, especially as you haven't edited in 6+ years. But we never got an author for the photograph, so we can't really follow the license parameters. If you're the author, could you please tag it? If it is someone else, could you please provide the permission statement as above? Thanks. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)