User talk:Maltaboy101

Nomination of The Downside Ball Game for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Downside Ball Game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Downside Ball Game until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bob Re-born (talk) 17:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with The Downside Ball Game. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 20:33, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ballgame1890.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ballgame1890.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:37, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Downside1910.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Downside1910.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:45, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:RearAdmiralScott.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RearAdmiralScott.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of deleted material

When articles or files are deleted as the result of a discussion - in this case at Possibly Unfree Files - please do not simply recreate the image under the same terms. It will simply be deleted again for the same reasons as it was the first time. If you continue to recreate deleted material in this way, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please take the time to read and understand our image licensing policies and ensure that you are selecting the appropriate license for images, as it looks like you have had a lot of difficulty with this in the past. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:05, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

You have added the same unsourced information and external link to the following three articles: 20th Century's Greatest Hits: 100 English-Language Books of Fiction, The 100 Best Books of All Time and Modern Library 100 Best Novels and, in at least one case, added the content repeatedly after being reverted. Before resuming these types of edits, please go by the Teahouse to ask questions about Wikipedia editing, read through Wikipedia:Plain and simple to gain an understanding of Wikipedia practices or go through the Wikipedia Tutorial. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 19:57, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Maltaboy101. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]