User talk:Malluu12
Keep up the good work with the gym articles
[edit]They are surprisingly high view. Especially this time of the quadrennium. But even at other times. It's just that Wiki does not seem to cover them as well as blogs and such. Sometimes can be hard to find RSes, but the specialty magazines (IG, etc.) are good ones to try.TCO (talk) 01:57, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- The Wikipedia articles got mentioned on Wired! That's awesome. AngusWOOF (talk) 07:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
For filling in the gym bios
[edit]
|
The team builder award |
| Thanks for contributing. TCO (talk) 02:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC) |
Medal templates
[edit]"removed junior europeans results from medal table because generally only senior results are included"
Is there a guideline or manual of style article that says infoboxes should only include senior results? Some articles, like the Russian wiki of Viktoria Komova seems to include her junior awards as well. Wolcott (talk) 06:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- There is not a guideline that I know of so I was just following what I had seen while reading other gymnasts pages. I think that the reasoning not to have the junior medals in the table is so that it doesn't get confused with the winner of the senior competition. I have seen junior results in the medal when the gymnast is competing in the senior division. I'm sorry if I came off as mean for removing the junior results, I just like things to be consistent.Malluu12 (talk) 05:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- The fact that there is no guideline or MoS page for gymnasts doesn't mean youth results should be excluded, and simply wanting "things to be consistent" is pretty much your own personal view of an article, rather than adhering to a neutral point of view. I'll be restoring some of the medal templates you removed, particularly the Youth Olympics as it is quite significant. There shouldn't be any confusion for that one, after all it does indicate "Youth". Wolcott (talk) 23:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- MOS and guidelines only exist to document already existing agreements and nothing more. Please don't stretch a lack of a written policy for a lack of one. In actu (Guerillero) | My Talk 19:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- The fact that there is no guideline or MoS page for gymnasts doesn't mean youth results should be excluded, and simply wanting "things to be consistent" is pretty much your own personal view of an article, rather than adhering to a neutral point of view. I'll be restoring some of the medal templates you removed, particularly the Youth Olympics as it is quite significant. There shouldn't be any confusion for that one, after all it does indicate "Youth". Wolcott (talk) 23:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Beth Tweddle
[edit]I may not fully have understood what you were trying to do (sorry if that's the case) but it seemed like you were removing citations because the urls were dead; per Wikipedia:Link rot this should not be done as the link may be repairable. Thanks - Basement12 (T.C) 00:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm fixing them. You just caught me in the middle of things. Don't worry everything will be referenced when I'm finished.Malluu12 (talk) 00:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:JordynWiebergoldmedal.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:JordynWiebergoldmedal.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Roots Web|accessdate=21 July 2015}}</ref><br />Sheikh Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum born 20 May 2012)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=royals&id=
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:46, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)