User talk:Malloryloren
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with GiftZip.com. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of GiftZip.com
[edit]
A tag has been placed on GiftZip.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tckma (talk) 17:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
The article GiftZip.com has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as GiftZip.com, you will be blocked from editing. --Finngall talk 20:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Malloryloren/GiftZip.com, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: User talk:Malloryloren/GiftZip.com was moved to Talk:GiftZip.com by Malloryloren (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-07-07T20:29:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
GiftZip.com is a free service, it sells no product and charges no fee, it is simply an aggregator. Therefore, speedy deletion based on the promotion of a product would not make sense. If the individuals calling for the page's deletion could potentially be more specific or perhaps, conduct some more research about said company, I believe this matter might be resolved quickly. Addressing the issue of significance, I believe the media surrounding GiftZip.com, included in the article, as well as its status as First Mover give it the weight needed to stay. If the article simply needs more references, they could be easily provided.