Hello, Mallneck! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Randykitty (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this edit, please think a bit before using words like "vandalism". The "reference" you added goes to a blank page and hence establishes nothing. That the Feinstein Institute exists is not contested by anyone, their homepage conclusively shows that they exist. That, as a non-profit, they are required to fill out certain forms is absolutely trivial: this goes for any US non-profit. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 14:41, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, this is now the second time that you designate a perfectly valid edit as "vandalism", ignoring the fact that the "reference" you added (twice) was just a blank page (corrected now fter I brought this to your attention just above). Please note that accusing someone of vandalism without a good reason is considered to be a personal attack. Apart from the website being a blank, you ignore the comment I pmade above. What, exactly, is the addition of this text supposed to achieve? Saying that they are a non-profit implies the reporting obligation, no need to mention that explicitly. And what, exactly, is this reference supposed to prove? To show that the Feinstein exists, the reason given in your edit summary, is superfluous because that is not contested by anyone. Apart from that, this is a primary reference and as such has only limited use on WP. I'll move it slightly upwards, as at least it is a source for the fact that the Feinstein is a non-profit. Please do not revert again without discussing your changes and refrain from calling other people's edits vandalismwithout good justification. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 06:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]