User talk:Mallarme

Welcome!

Hello Mallarme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- SoothingR^(pour) 12:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Krishnamurti

Thanks for pointing me to the Hungarian website. You are probably right about the postings there being copyright violations. I see that the reference to From Darkness to Light which I found listed at somewhere as the first volume of Collected Works (but with no other publication data) conflicts with the Hungarian site's listing of The Art of Listening as the first of the Collected Works. I will try to track that down. OK, evidently the "Volume one" was a user's inscription in a copy of Darkness to Light, and someone then entered it as part of the title at the Alibris.com site. --Blainster 19:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, thank you for your edits to Kamashastra. It has been a very neglected article. --BorgQueen 17:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hinduism

Welcome to the project! If need you need any help or have to ask something about the project you are always welcome to talk to me. Gizza^Chat ^© 04:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Yoga controversy

Dear Hinduism Project editors,

There is a controversy on the Hinduism regarding Raja Yoga. Please read the debate on the Hinduism discussion page. Your comments are requested on the Hinduism discussion page to help resolve the controversy. Thank you. HeBhagawan 15:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your reminder

Thanks for the reminder, however, I do not feel that I have violated AGF or CIVIL. Though I feel you have in some of your comments about Sandstein. However, I chose to assume good faith of you and instead ascribed it to a language issue rather than a deliberate attempt to disrupt his RfA. If you were to take the hypothetical path you mentioned and the page were deleted again, we would simply have to delete-protect the name. It really is not the way to deal with this issue. Sarah Ewart 13:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I do not have a problem with you having the article in your userspace as long as you do not use it to violate deletion policy. I was concerned when I first found it that you may try to repost it again, but I accept what you are saying and I believe that is not your intention. Cheers, Sarah Ewart 19:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikispam

Thanks for your comments and your defence of someone you feel has contributed. There is a very good argument about whether links put up under WP:COI should be removed automatically or checked (and I am sympathetic to the view no one should do a change to WP which makes an article worse, so they should be checked one by one, but often these people leave a very long list). People have different views on this.

However please do not think that Kh7 is all sweet and innocent: look through all her edits. Edits like [1] where she replaced a perfectly good link which her own link claiming that the link had "moved". It hadn't: she just didn't own the site she moved the link from. It is very hard to regard this kind of behaviour as a minor transgression by a beloved community member... it was naughty, and mean. --BozMo talk 23:11, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vernon Harrison

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vernon Harrison, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Vernon Harrison. Doc^g 23:09, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Study in Consciousness

I have nominated Study in Consciousness, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Study in Consciousness. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of HPB: The Extraordinary Life and Influence of Helena Blavatsky

I have nominated HPB: The Extraordinary Life and Influence of Helena Blavatsky, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HPB: The Extraordinary Life and Influence of Helena Blavatsky. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 11:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Esoteric World of Madame Blavatsky

I have nominated The Esoteric World of Madame Blavatsky, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Esoteric World of Madame Blavatsky. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 11:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mallarme! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 41 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

S. P. Gupta - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jocelyne François - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hélène de Monferrand - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Collected Writings of H. P. Blavatsky

I have nominated Collected Writings of H. P. Blavatsky, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collected Writings of H. P. Blavatsky. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 13:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Hinduism

WikiProject Hinduism

Hello, Mallarme. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!

Subscribe

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James A. Long

The article James A. Long has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:Notability and unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Coulomb Affair for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coulomb Affair, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coulomb Affair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Theosophy in Scandinavia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Theosophy in Scandinavia, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theosophy in Scandinavia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Theosophical Society of New York for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Theosophical Society of New York is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theosophical Society of New York until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Big Money Threepwood (talk) 04:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]