User talk:Malinaccier/January 2008
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Malinaccier. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rondache, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/rondache. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- The text can be used because it is GFDL licensed on the en Wiktionary. Thanks! Malinaccier (talk) 23:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Please read the relevant guidelines before voting at AfDs.
WP:CLS applies in this case.
The Transhumanist 01:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Malinaccier (talk) 01:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
|
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed nearly unanimously with 46 support, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thanks for supporting me! |
-Djsasso (talk) 17:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. You're ready for the tools. Malinaccier (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA Thanks
|
|
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which closed successfully with 34 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral. I appreciate your support! I promise I will wield the mop wisely, and do my best to improve Wikipedia. -- AKeen (talk) 15:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
- You're welcome, and good luck! Malinaccier (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Forgive me for impeding but...
I was just looking through recent changes (the user section) and saw this page. Just wanted you to know, you can count on my support. :) You're a very good editor and I do wish you become an admin. Good luck with the remainder of the time you'll be spending at Admin Coaching and the eventual RFA! Best regards, Rt. 16:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- You need Sat-Nav to get through what I've wrote. :D (Sorry, that's quite bad.) Would you like a co-nomination for yours, whenever it is? Best regards, Rt. 23:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Who would have though it? Yeah, I will do exactly that then. Get in touch when it's over. :) Best, Rt. 23:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
My RFA
No worries about it, i understood but its a long story why i requested adminship... i didnt expect to get it ^_^ No hard feelings
♥♦¢åŗđş♣♠ (talk) 02:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, hopefully you will have better luck next time...Malinaccier (talk) 03:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate, that landed on WP:100! I paid close attention to everything that was said, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holidays and all the off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, and have a great new year, --Elonka 18:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations, and have fun with the tools. Malinaccier (talk) 18:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
In this edit Diff I wondered why you voted oppose then posted questions. The three questions were fairly simple and straight forward but because of the order in which you made your edits and the state of the vote count at the time I took a while trying to read more into then was there. I have responded, I hope you find the answers enlightening :) Jeepday (talk) 23:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
RFA
I think it's fairly obvious that you know what you're doing on Wikipedia. If you don't mind, I can nominate you right now or sometime later. If you accept, then I'll create the page and tell Rudget. bibliomaniac15 17:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- All right. Until then, so long. bibliomaniac15 21:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
First Edit
Happy First Edit Day
|
Happy First Edit Day, Malinaccier', from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! User:Malinaccier (talk) 06:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC) |
- FROM YOUR FRIEND:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 04:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks
|
|
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which which passed nem. con. with 45 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral. Thank you for your support and all the kind words that were expressed. I will try to live up to the trust placed in me by the community. I now have my homework to do and then pass the Marigolds. |
- Thanks for your tricky question and especially your support. Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 16:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, have fun! Malinaccier Public (talk) 17:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Apology
I saw your warning on my talk page. I think what happened was I accidently rolled back your edit when I was rolling back vandals. I apologize for this, I was trying to be helpful not cause an issue. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmanigold (talk • contribs) 01:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Wheel and axel
The article Wheel and axel consists of "hi jennifer or DAD!" and a "hangon" tag with no speedy delete template. I tagged it for deletion but left the hangon tag as it is possible the creator wants to add to it.
I notice you then removed the deletion tag, leaving the article untagged but still containing no meaningful content. Is it your view that a speedy delete tag was inappropriate? Euryalus (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) No worries, I was just wondering if I had missed something important and tagged it wrongly. It's something I keep in mind when tagging very new pages - there is sometimes a history to them that is not immediately apparent and when an established editor removes a tag I like to ask why in case I've missed the back story. This one has been deleted now anyway, so issue resolved. Euryalus (talk) 01:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- And thanks for the smile. Euryalus (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
|
Thanks for your support | |
| Thank you SO MUCH for your support in my unanimous RFA. Take this cookie as a small token of my appreciation.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
Yep, good luck and have fun being an admin! Malinaccier Public (talk) 17:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Rudget!
- Congratulations and good luck! Malinaccier Public (talk) 12:57, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
no vandalism here
Hello
I'm attempting to remove an inappropriate poem added within the last few days which constitutes vandalism under WP:Vandalism. I also added a topic to the Talk Page to bring it into discussion there per WP Policy. I originally deleted it as a mistake rather than undoing it..which is why I undid my first edit, so that I could then use the undo in the history. It was then my intention to cite my reasons but you began reverting me while I was in the process.
Reason for removal cited as WP:Vandalism "The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, or the insertion of nonsense into articles."
Please check my contributions and you will see that I'm no vandal Berean Hunter (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. Malinaccier (talk) 00:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Berean Hunter (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hah! That smiley is nifty and feels good to get it so here is to sharing it back!
I had started to think on my end that you were the poet...
Thank you for helping me..I'm still learning & trying to improve as an editor.
Cheers Berean Hunter (talk) 00:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA Thanks
Hi Malinaccier - thanks for your participation in my request for adminship. It passed 52/0/0, and I'm now in possession of a shiny new mop. If I can ever help you with anything, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 08:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Good job, a unanimous vote. Have fun, Malinaccier Public (talk) 13:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC).
rfa
Thank you for your support in my RFA of last week. If you ever need assistance, let me know. Archtransit (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 |
...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.
In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.
By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.
Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.
John Carter (talk) 17:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome, both of you. Malinaccier Public (talk) 17:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
My request for adminship was successful at 64/1/2! Many thanks for your participation and I will endeavor to meet your expectations. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 09:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, good job. Malinaccier Public (talk) 12:57, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Your RFA
Has been created. See Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Malinaccier. Remember to transclude it in the main page when you are done answering the questions. Good luck! bibliomaniac15 00:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think you should wait and adjust the date when he does to be seven days after his addition of the co-nom. bibliomaniac15 00:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Done Rudget. 13:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Are you transcluding it soon? :) Rudget. 14:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Yeah... Malinaccier (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- You transcluding it wrong. :) Go onto WP:RFA Rudget. 14:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw. :) Malinaccier (talk) 14:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Done! Malinaccier (talk) 14:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- That was probably my fastest support! :) Rudget. 14:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Haha. Maybe someone will notice and give you a barnstar. Malinaccier (talk) 14:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- That was probably my fastest support! :) Rudget. 14:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Good luck, my friend. :D GlassCobra 19:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Malinaccier (talk) 19:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Pity barnstar
Thanks very much for it! I've added it to my user page. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
Hey there, I'm writing to inform you that I have withdrawn my request for adminship, which was currently standing at 11 supports, 22 opposes and 6 neutrals. This count could have been so much better if I had understood policy, although I believe that 17 questions is a lot to ask of a user's first RfA. I will take on all comments given at the RfA and will endeavour to meet the high expectations of the RfA voters. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 21:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, maybe in a few months? Malinaccier (talk) 17:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Barnstar of Reversion | |
| For reverting so many unhelpful edits and vandalism on Wikipedia I User Swirlex award you this Barnstar. |
Need the administrator's help
Hello. I thank you for welcoming me to the site but I need your help: Please look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam#Introduction
I am very distressed about the situation. There are some editor refusing to back down and making us have "resistance movement" in the article about Tamil tigers. I have said many times that this is unfair as my friends were hurt in LTTE bombing and that if anyone tried to do this on article about Al Qaeda it would be reverted straight away if they said AQ was a "resistance movement". Just because fewer people are aware of the action of LTTE doesn't mean that this sympathising to terrorist attitude should be allowed on LTTE article just as it isn't on 9/11 and AQ. Please help Ismailmk (talk) 13:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I replied on your talk page. Malinaccier Public (talk) 13:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thx
|
Thanks for your support, my request for adminship passed 60/0/0 yesterday!
I want to thank Mrs.EasterBunny and Royalbroil for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. To paraphrase a president ... I wish my mum and dad could see the comments made. My dad would be so proud to see the comments ... and my mum would have believed them". I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and you may be surprised to find that I have not deleted all of the pages by accident..... yet). Thanks again, Victuallers (talk) 20:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC) |
 |
|---|
- Good luck with the mop! Malinaccier (talk) 23:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for your support - we both have a good coach, and I trust his judgement on when to throw myself to the wolves. Thanks again, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 13:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA thank-spam
- Have fun weilding the mop! Malinaccier (talk) 22:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
|
Thanks for your support at my request for adminship, which passed today with 42/0/0!
I would like to thank Wizardman for nominating me, Malinaccier/January 2008 and everyone else for their support and comments. I'll continue with contributing to the encyclopedia's content (hopefully writing an FA here and there :) and will help out with admin-related tasks which you just entrusted me with. If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask! Thanks again, —dima/talk/ 01:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
You're welcome. Good luck with the mop. Malinaccier (talk) 01:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
You are now an administrator
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the administrators' how-to guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Also, the practice exercises at the new admin school may be useful. If you have any questions, get in touch on my talk page. WjBscribe 15:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Good luck to you. If you doubt it, ask it. If you know it, do it!. Enjoy the buttons - Keeper | 76 16:00, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Likewise, well done. Sure you'll do a great job. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 17:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Congrats!
Good job on your RFA! SpencerT♦C 17:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Malinaccier (talk) 17:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Somethings wrong with you're rfa message, because it seems to change all of the following text on my page. SpencerT♦C —Preceding comment was added at 17:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Think I fixed it...Malinaccier (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. Thanks. SpencerT♦C 17:27, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
About your RfA
Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. I am glad you passed, and you are welcome for the support. For information on using your new tools, see the school for new admins; you will find it very useful. Good luck! Acalamari 17:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations from me too! :) - PeaceNT (talk) 17:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, all of you! Malinaccier (talk) 17:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Congrats man, you deserve it. And you're more than welcome to my userpage design. :) GlassCobra 19:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks (2)
Hey Malinaccier, first I want to say congrats on becoming an admin!! I also wanted to thank you for your support in my RFA. I look forward to working with you in the future to make Wikipedia just a little cleaner. Thanks again and let's get to work! :-)
Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 18:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well done! I knew you would make it! Just don't be too hasty with your new tools. bibliomaniac15 18:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks both of you, and congrats Gonzo! Malinaccier (talk) 18:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulations to you both! Best of luck! Keilana|Parlez ici 20:32, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks and you're welcome in one message
- Good job on becoming an admin; have some cake.
- Thanks for granting non-admin rollback!
Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 19:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
My RFA
|
|
Thanks! | |
| Malinaccier/January 2008, thank you for showing your support in my RFA which passed with 38 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral! I also want to give special thanks to my Admin Coach and nominator, Useight for all of his help and support. I promise that I'll give my best effort as an admin, and I hope that your confidence in me proves to be justified. If I can ever be of any help, please let me know. In the mean time, I have some cleaning to do. Have a great day! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Good luck, glad to be working with you! Malinaccier (talk) 02:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
my RfA
|
Thanks for participating in my RfA! | |
| Although it failed 43/27/0, I'm happy because the outcome has been very helpful in many meaningful ways. Your support and remarks contributed so much to this. If you followed my RfA you know what happened. Most of the editors who posted opposing opinions have never edited with me. Some articles I edit deal with controversial topics and with respect to a very few of these, editors who didn't know much about me had some worries about confrontational editing and civility. Since I support their high standards I can easily (and will gladly) address this. The support and ecouragement to run again soon has been outstanding, thanks again. Cheers! Gwen Gale (talk) 05:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Sorry, maybe next time. Malinaccier (talk) 02:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Admin coaching
Thank you for your offer! I see that you’re new to this, but you’ve got to start somewhere, right? After reading through your RfA, though, I’m convinced that you’ll make an excellent coach. I agree to your condition and accept your offer. Thanks again. —Travistalk 21:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
SALT
Yes, I have salted it. I'm guessing it might have been cascade protected at WP:PT before the development of direct protection for deleted articles. bibliomaniac15 22:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
RfA
Many thanks for your support. I don't believe in spamming round pretty pictures, but I will be thanking all who participated. Now, where's that mop? There's a hell of a pile of debris to clear up! Kind regards, --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 23:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Icestorm815 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thank you for the barnstar! Happy editing!
RfA thanks
|
|
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which was unsuccessful with 19 support, 18 oppose, and 5 neutral. I have signed up for admin coaching and will retry later on in a couple more months. |
I hope that by performing more edits on Wikipedia in the next few months that I could possibly change your mind by my next RfA, possibly around May 2008. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, better luck next time. Malinaccier Public (talk) 13:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Congrats
(Sorry I'm late, was away!) You're more than welcome, and congrats. I was actually (hoping?) expecting that my comment would draw some backlash, but aaah well - you can't win 'em all :D Anyway, enjoy the tools. Cheers, Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 05:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! Malinaccier Public (talk) 13:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Airman's Cave
You're deletion doesn't match why you deleted my article. Airman's cave has historical significance and I can't see how it fits under your tag of section A7. Can you please explain? If you'd actually looked at the article you'd see that it doesn't fit this category. Lacitpo (talk) 00:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Lacitpo, I've looked over the deleted page, and the deletion log. This particular page has been deleted three times, twice as copyright infringements. Malinaccier was right in deleting it a third time. I will post this on your talkpage also. Keeper | 76 00:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Keeper. Malinaccier (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, So I started this whole quest to have Airmen's Cave created as a wikipedia article the wrong way. I am leaving this message on all 3 admins who graciously pointed out my previous errors in my origional 3 creations and I would like to state my case to have this article re-instated.
- 1st regarding the blatant copyrite infringement. I have rewritten the article in complete to remove the copyrite problems, and even the paraphrasing I attempted in my second attempt at the article. All of the text in the current version of the article is my own, with facts pulled from relevant sources.
- 2nd My article was deleted based on Wikipedia:CSD#A7 which to my understanding is a policy there to prevent trivial articles. I would like to cite the following 2 sources to both prove via what I think qualify as credible sources that my article is both not trivial and that the information contained within is citable.
- My second source to cite information about the cave is from [The World Caves Database http://www-sop.inria.fr/agos-sophia/sis/DB/database.html]. If you scroll down to the United States on [this list http://www-sop.inria.fr/agos-sophia/sis/DB/countries.html] from their site you will see Airmen's Cave listed, with information including it's total length.
- 3rd My original retype of the article included information from the personal web site of Michael Wescott Loder who is accepted as one of the caves original explorers and did significant work mapping the cave. This information sadly, is not citable yet since I have not been able to find credible coverage to back up the information presented on his web site. The current write up of the Airmen's Cave article I would like to implement will not include information from this source until I find a credible and scholarly way to cite it as accurate. I would like to link 2 sites here, which are people's personal sites that though not citable, do backup in greater detail much of the information I've put forth here. I believe these to might qualify for being added as external links to allow readers to navigate to the pages and read and decide for themselves.
- [Michael Wescott Loder's personal page regarding the cave http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/m/w/mwl2/Airmen's_Cave.html]
- [Enthusiast's page with a collection of information about Airmen's Cave http://www.io.com/~iareth/airmens.html]
- Lacitpo (talk) 04:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:55, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Adminship
Well handled! I knew you could do it, you appear to be doing fine and I know you'll continue that trend. Thank you for your continued support of the preceeding few days/week, it has proved invaluable. Regards, Rudget. 16:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Redwall
Doesn't seem to have much going on. :( Perhaps it might be worth a discussion to become a subproject of WikiProject Novels? Drop me a line back with your thoughts. GlassCobra 19:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:Malinaccier. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |