User talk:Makkarpaiyan

July 2020

Hello, I'm DMacks. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Subiksha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 07:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at G. V. Prakash Kumar, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [1] Additionally, names have to be properly capitalised. Please try not to be so lazy next time. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Smruthi venkat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smruthi venkat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smruthi venkat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 14:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Makkarpaiyan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm creating article on behalf of smruthi venkat.Other than that Im not misusing anything here Makkarpaiyan (talk) 12:25 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 19:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Makkarpaiyan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please i will follow the wikipedia guidelines and as i dont know about this earlier im sure i will follow the guideline Makkarpaiyan (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to describe what guidelines you have not followed and how you will follow them in the future. 331dot (talk) 06:42, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Makkarpaiyan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I used two accounts on another account sandbox i wrote and copied the content here.will use one account in future Makkarpaiyan (talk) 09:47, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Can you tell us the name of all the accounts you have ever created? Also, you say you are creating articles on behalf of someone: that tells me you do not understand our rules on WP:PAID or WP:COI editing. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 03:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of File:Smruthi Venkat Aug 2020.jpg

The file File:Smruthi Venkat Aug 2020.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Smruthi venkat. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]