User talk:MakesTheWikiBetter

April 2018

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maryland have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually CLCStudent, it is applied that Maryland is a dangerous state, because I heard that it is a dangerous state. (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MakesTheWikiBetter, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MakesTheWikiBetter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

Yeah ok thx!

16:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Maryland. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Lilo & Stitch, you may be blocked from editing. Lilo & Stitch is set in Hawaii, but that does not make it a "Hawaiian" film. The country parameter in the infobox and the mention of the United States in the opening line refers to what the country the film was produced in, and even then, Hawaii is a U.S. state, not a separate country. –WPA (talk) 01:15, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Trolls (film). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:51, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you're going through articles and changing them to fit what you think is true, regardless of what any citations say. This is considered disruptive editing on Wikipedia. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia goes by what reliable sources say. It is not based on what its own contributors believe to be true – this is called original research, and it is forbidden. What you need to do is look up what sources say about something, summarize what they say in your words, and then cite them. For film and related media, one source that we use quite often is Variety, a trade magazine. You can see other vetted sources at this list from WikiProject Film. Many other WikiProjects maintain helpful lists of sources they consider to be reliable. Please take the time to ask any questions you may have at the teahouse, a forum for new users. If you keep editing like you are now, you're going to end up blocked from editing fairly quickly. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate, please shut up over a little edit on Wikipedia. I can do what I like now! Let's keep editing!!! MakesTheWikiBetter 22:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 23:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your attitude of telling another user to "shut up" is also unhelpful. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and getting along with others is a must. 331dot (talk) 23:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ya know, I don't really care. I can say shut up when I like. Shut up, shut up, shut up, shut up, shut up, shut your piehole. Shut up. MakesTheWikiBetter 08:48, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 14:33, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MakesTheWikiBetter

User:MakesTheWikiBetter, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MakesTheWikiBetter and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MakesTheWikiBetter during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 10^Eleventeen 17:27, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]