User talk:Majesteit

Welcome!

Hello, Majesteit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Deb 12:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weill & Bede

I've added a citation. Here's what you're looking for: http://classiclit.about.com/library/bl-etexts/bede/bl-bede-2-13.htm Paul S (talk) 13:21, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

You sumbitted these move requests:
- Joueurs de Flute, flute and piano, Op. 27. I want to move it to the article I created later, which has a circonsflexe on the 'u' of the word Flûte. However, I don't seem to be able to move it. Don't know why it's being refused exactly. Maybe if someone moves it, he/she can also change the title to 'Joueurs de Flûte, for flute and piano, Op. 27'? Without the word 'for' in it it sounds quite ugly. Thanks.Majesteit (talk) 03:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Old title → New Title (move) – Reason for change Majesteit (talk) 03:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please re-submit this request, using this format:
    {{subst:RMassist|Old title|New Title|Reason for change}}
  with "Old title" and "New Title" and "Reason for change" replaced as appropriate. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Luc De Schepper

I've nominated Luc De Schepper for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luc De Schepper. As you are the only editor I can find who has made substantive contributions to the article and is still active, I thought you may be interested in weighing in on the discussion. Monty ₈₄₅ 16:52, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Herscu

Hello, I placed this in the talk section of my page, Paul Herscu. Thank you.

Hello, My name is Paul Herscu. I am just jumping in here. I have not really done this before in Wikipedia and am not sure if I am in the right place, so Apologize ahead of time. A colleague emailed me to tell me that there was a problem with the page referencing me. I then went to that page, and saw that there were requests for citations, explanations, etc. Since I had not put up this page in the first place, I had to work out the mechanics of how to do that. As a result, I have placed/made the following changes to the page. First, I removed some words, such as 'extensive' and instead added a list of countries where I had taught, all verifiable by anyone searching the web. However, this now presents the page with a list of countries, which makes it look odd, but at least it answers that point. Second, I added half a dozen references. Most are what is called a 1st tier journal. For example, Critical Care Medicine is the number one journal for emergency room physicians around the world. The other journals are of a similar quality, which explains why the articles are referenced by others. For example, in the Critical Care Medicine article referenced, the editors took the oppurtunity to highlight this article are have a long editorial on its' level of importance to saving lives in the ED. Third, I have tried to create a balance between my various interests. Simply, my main interest is to help physicians find the right treatment, for each person, the first time out. I do that in the Complementary Alternative Medicine-CAM(referenced now), but I also do that in drug discovery pharmaceutical world (referenced now), and in clinical trials for a variety of diseases in some of the major hospitals around the country (referenced now). I know, on the face of it, it may seem that my interests are in conflict, as CAM might seem different from drugs, pharmaceuticals and hospitals, but if you read through my biography, you see that the main idea is the same, create systems that help clinicians find the appropriate therapy for their patients. If I had created this page, I probably would have placed that balance as it should be. However, it looks like this page was first created with a bias towards the CAM side of the equation. And if I read the string of comments here correctly, it looks like some people do not like CAM. However, in light of the references and other changes that create more balance in the page and may help you get a better sense of the overall work, I request that this request for deletion be withdrawn, and the topic closed. Thank you, Sincerely, Paul Herscu Hello again, I am just following up , as no one has responded to the above. when you look at the page titled Wikipedia Talk Page, found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines, one of the main points they make is the following: "This page in a nutshell: Talk pages are for improving the encyclopedia, not for expressing personal opinions on a subject or an editor." It seems as though the last remaining comments may fit in this category. however, I actually believe that these comments were due to an incomplete, unreferenced page, and that they probably no longer relate to the page there. i do not know how long these steps go on for, but thought I would add these comments, though i konw you probably are aware of the guidelines already. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.136.252.169 (talk) 15:01, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kinski

Thanks for the quote. Please also add details of where and when and by whom the article were made. Debresser (talk) 09:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Majesteit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]