User talk:Maisamhussainmirza

Maisamhussainmirza, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Maisamhussainmirza! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:47, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Primary and secondary sources

Hi Maisamhussainmirza, please avoid basing an article entirely on primary sources. Please provide independent secondary sources for statements, especially those about "fame" or positive attributes, and for any addition of a large section dedicated to details. You may be blocked from editing if you continue to disruptively ignore community concerns such as those voiced on this page here. Take your time to respond to others' messages, and do not edit war against their concerns. This may be a final warning. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the article's talk page

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:S. V. Mir Ahmed Ali § Independent secondary sources. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on S. V. Mir Ahmed Ali. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:24, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Maisamhussainmirza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is the issue?

Decline reason:

I suggest you read Wikipedia:Edit warring. PhilKnight (talk) 13:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.