User talk:Mairi/Archive4

This is an archive. Do not add new discussion here; use my talk page.

Help with religion merge?

Someone over at the Religion wikiproject is looking for admin help: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion#Proposed merger of Ancestor Worship and Veneration of the dead --Alynna (talk) 11:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll take a look and help them out. Mairi (talk) 12:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for merging! I really appreciate your help. (Now all I have to do is put my money where my mouth is and try put the page in order.)VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help me with new template

Hi I want your help to add a new template which may look better than now for Northern Province, Sri Lanka without changing any material in it. especially motto is not visible and it look old when comparing with other countries regional templates. Will you please help me by adding new template for it. Thank you --BlueLankan 15:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Template for Sri Lankan provinces

Thank you so much for your new template. --BlueLankan 21:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Category:Bondage

Hello! I see you've created Category:Bondage. I was wondering, since it is a subcategory of Category:BDSM, shouldn't all articles in Category:Bondage that only deal with bondage be removed from the supercategory Category:BDSM? JIP | Talk 15:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they should (with the possible exception of the article bondage). I hadn't gotten around to moving most of them.-Mairi (talk) 15:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ROC-politician-stub and ROC-university-stub

May I know where had the articles categorised with this tagged gone? China-stub or Taiwan-stub? Montemonte (talk) 21:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help me with Template of Sri Lankan Province

Hi Hw r u ?. I need your help to clean up template for Northern Province, Sri Lanka which may look better than now. especially demonym and legislature are not in the template. can you please hel pme out in it?? Thank you. --BlueLankan 15:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Mary of Bethany

Care to take a look at this? It looks like someone's stripped a bunch of the formatting and added large blocks of unformatted text. --Alynna (talk) 00:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spadone?

Hello, Mairi. You have new messages at Newman Luke's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

External Fertilisation

What animals fertilise externally? How do they fertilise externally? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.28.180.118 (talk) 11:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you're asking me this, as I don't know much about the topic, but external fertilization explains how it happens. Many species of fish do so, including salmon. -Mairi (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SfD

Hi, Mairi. I'm all done orphaning {{PL-stub}} and I've moved it to the "to delete" section of SfD. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 23:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mairi! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

José Reyes Baeza Terrazas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Juan José León Rubio - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subpages for protected templates

Hello, as the admin who closed some of the decisions on Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/June/6 I am hoping to avoid a trip to WP:DRV and to ask you to reconsider your closures of those discussions. I apologise in advance for restoring Template:PRChina-stub/doc: I didn't realise that this was also under discussion as your deletion summary simply said "orphaned" rather than linking to the SfD discussion.

Regarding the group nomination for {{Judaism-stub/doc}}, {{Islam-stub/doc}}, {{Gospel-music-stub/doc}}, {{Christianity-stub/doc}}, {{Geology-stub/doc}} and {{Soft-drink-stub/doc}}, it seems that there wasn't really consensus to delete these. Furthermore some of the arguments of those arguing to delete does not seem particularly strong, appealing to "past precedent". The main concern that was raised is that separate documentation for stub templates would duplicate and possibly contradict the instructions at WP:STUB. The use of centralised documentation Template:Stub documentation allays those fears, I believe. The intention is not to use these pages for documentation; it is only to store categories and interwiki links so that editors can maintain these without the intervention of an administrator. This is standard practice when templates are protected.

Look forward to hearing your views. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Precedent on how stubs are done, in absence of any reason why individual cases are unique, is often used as reasoning on WP:SFD. In addition, the use of /doc pages for interwiki links (and categories, although {{asbox}} does that for stub templates) wasn't the main focuse of the discussion, instead the use as general documentation was. And that use most people found unnecessary. It's impossible to know what consensus would have been if interwiki links were the (sole) intended purpose of the /doc templates (and, since only some of the templates are protected, it's possible it would vary depending on the template).

As far as {{PRChina-stub/doc}}, I don't recall why I put that for the deletion summary, instead of linking to WP:SFD. My mistake there.

Has there been any more recent discussion at WP:WSS (or elsewhere) regarding /doc for stub templates? To me, it would seem to be better to discuss and reach consensus on the general issue of /doc templates, rather than the deletion of these 6 specifically. --Mairi (talk) 16:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I haven't had any conversation with WSS about this pages recently. This is mainly because, as I mentioned above, it is standard practice across the template namespace to put categories and interwiki links into an unprotected /doc page. This is not an issue confined to stub-sorting, but an issue with templates in general. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear in those deletion discussions. There were a few similar debates around that time, and I was getting bored repeating my reasoning each time, so I started to link to my previous post rather than type it again! I was never advocating having separate documentation on these pages, and I don't think many other people were. Now that you understand the intention of these /doc pages, would you be happy if I recreated them for the sole purpose of category and interwiki links? I am planning to do this for all protected stub templates, not just these six. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Part of the problem with those debates seems to have been too many different conceptions of /docs, and possibly people misunderstanding each other. While you weren't advocating separate documentation on those, some others appeared to be ("a customized notice about where to use the stub as it relates to the subject is perfectly valid reason for the inclusion of a documents page"). So people reacted to that, and not the simpler idea of just a page for interwiki and category links.

Personally, I have no objection to /doc pages for protected stub templates; they make sense. Do note, however, that not all of those are protected -- {{soft-drink-stub}} and {{Gospel-music-stub}} aren't. So I have no objection to those 4 being recreated, along with new ones for other protected stub templates. That isn't to say, however, that other people won't have problems with them and they might end up on SFD again. Hopefully that won't happen, but it might if there isn't some discussion/consensus somewhere else first. -Mairi (talk) 17:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of emoticons

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of emoticons. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of emoticons. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:US Anthony dollar coin reverse.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:US Anthony dollar coin reverse.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:29, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MSU Interview

Dear Mairi,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 04:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Catholicism stubs

Hi Mairi. I am working on stub sorting and I have placed a proposal related to Eastern Catholicism. Would you be so kind and write your opinion on it here? Thank you! Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:US Anthony dollar coin reverse.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:US Anthony dollar coin reverse.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:14, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Pangender

An article that you have been involved in editing, Genderqueer, has been proposed for a merge with the article Pangender. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. --April Arcus (talk) 07:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Swinging

Category:Swinging, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am proposing that this category be renamed to Category:Swinging (sexual practice) to avoid confusion with commons:category:Swinging. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:21, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What can be done about the troll with multiple vandalism only accounts?

Hi! Sorry to bug you but I see that you're an administrator and thus by definition more experienced in Wikipedia editing than me. I have a question regarding the troll who keeps vandalizing Surtr‎, Sinmara‎, Jötunn and probably other articles I'm not following, generally adding defamatory words such as 'devil'. Is there any way that administrators can freeze their IP and their ability to make one after another vandalism-only sock puppet? Thanks Trilobitealive (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is possibly to block IP addresses for vandalism. However, since IP addresses change, blocks are generally for a short period of time so as not to block other, non-vandal users. And, if their IP addresses changes (and they seem to have one that does), it's even harder for a block to step them effectively without catching other users.

General policy is to warn first, and then block. I put a warning on the most recent IP (User talk:2601:9:700:62B:450F:F1D9:E364:1D13). If they continue, you should give them another warning (in addition to the reverting). If it continues, or you get to warning level 4, post on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, and an administrator can block if appropriate. Mairi (talk) 14:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that is a start. I started out conscientiously warning them but gave up because their mode of operating appears to make an edit or two from one address then switch to another. It got to feeling pointless as they went from one account to another. It occurred to me that they might be one of the perverted subtype of troll who somehow feeds on our collective politeness, our collective attempt to avoid biting and to avoid insults. Another thing which occurred to me that this isn't a troll but some sort of perverted religious believer who truly believes they are on some sort of jihad against the infidel heathens. So in the end I started reverting them with minimal effort, although I will admit to breaking the spirit of not insulting on my last two edits, which is when I sought your guidance. If you review the history of these articles you'll see that there are other several other editors involved in this Whac-a-mole reversion but the mole keeps coming back.Trilobitealive (talk) 00:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please help

Please withdraw your nomination for speedy deletion. I am in the process of moving Jane Foster to Jane Foster Zlatovski. There is a slight delay because the move has to be done by an administrator. I tried making the move myself but was informed that the move had to be done by an administrator. If there is another article with this name then of course they have to be merged unless they are two different people. I have already created a disambiguation page for Jane Foster but did not realize that this process could become so convoluted. You may have wanted to check my editing history. If you had, you probably would have noticed that this is not exactly not my first article. New page patrollers need appreciation and so let me express that appreciation for your efforts. The Very Best of Regards,

Bfpage |leave a message 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pope stubs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Pope stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dawynn (talk) 16:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to join Stub Improvement WikiProject

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Stub improvement. We work on improving stub articles on Wikipedia to above stub status quality. If you are interested in joining, please feel free to visit the Project Page!. Thank You. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}(please reply using {{ping}}) 18:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Mairi. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Mairi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mairi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mairi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

List of LEGO computer and video games listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of LEGO computer and video games. Since you had some involvement with the List of LEGO computer and video games redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 14:25, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mairi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mairi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Archbishops of Western Europe has been nominated for discussion

Category:Archbishops of Western Europe, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Synergism listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Synergism. Since you had some involvement with the Synergism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 17:11, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email
Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak
Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:23, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Prayers by Meher Baba

A tag has been placed on Category:Prayers by Meher Baba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anglican priests has been nominated for merging

Category:Anglican priests has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"☿" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ☿. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 10#☿ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Varttina - Double Life.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Varttina - Double Life.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Archbishops of Washington has been nominated for renaming

Category:Archbishops of Washington has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Archbishops of Baltimore has been nominated for renaming

Category:Archbishops of Baltimore has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:58, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Archbishops of Quebec has been nominated for renaming

Category:Archbishops of Quebec has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Archbishops of Westminster has been nominated for renaming

Category:Archbishops of Westminster has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I sure created a bunch of these 15 (!?!) years ago. No opinion on what happens to them now, beyond consistency with the other categories. Mairi (talk) 17:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Synod

The article Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Synod has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 02:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)