User talk:Mailersonly

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Mailersonly. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:15, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Script in articles not allowed

As per discussion and hence wikipedia policy, scripts in articles are not allowed. Sooner or later all your such edits will be reverted. Just friendly note. neo (talk) 20:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In case you missed it, the formulation of consensus is here: WP:INDICSCRIPT. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:54, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Arjun_Sarja shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

As noted above, the edit you keep making does not fall within the accepted Wikipedia guidelines. Please revert yourself. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

and none of the other edits you are making to insert Indic scripts are acceptable either. Please stop your disruptive editing. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:20, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

If you continue to insert Indic script names after having been told multiple times that consensus has determined that we will not use them in articles, YOU WILL BE BLOCKED. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert yourself or you will be reported and blocked. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Abhishek ^Talk 09:32, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported your disruptive editing to admins — Abhishek ^Talk 09:52, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 11:09, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

content requires sources

Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of multiple accounts, edit warring on multiple articles, and continuation of the same kind of disruptive editing as led to the previous block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]