User talk:Maikeru

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Maikeru, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -Zero^Talk 01:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Sorry, but the English not is my natal language and I still learning it... because of this, I have a lots of errors in my words... is more easy to me quote and paste some lines... xP - Zeromaru X

That's all right, really... but it's more of an attempt to avoid trouble to not copy/paste; it's unfortunately considered plagiarism and, while it wasn't a popular article you edited, it's still something that can lead to serious trouble. Maikeru 22:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Space Lone Wolf

This is the only site that I've found with Muto as Space Lone Wolf. See if you can get some info off of it, as my translator leaves a lot of symbols intact... http://pulolesu.game-server.cc/history/muto/muto8.html --Voievod 00:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-Zack (Mobile suit)

Thanks for the heads-up. I have notified the editor who deleted it previously here so he can assess whether the new version overcomes the problems at AfD. I'd check myself, but the old version has of course been deleted. --Butseriouslyfolks 00:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC) An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hi-Zack (Mobile suit). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jeffpiatt 04:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re your comment in an edit summary

I'm simply reverting AMIB's destructive edits. I suggest you check WP:Gundam and a few other relevant talk pages; it is completely impossible to discuss matters with the man if you disagree with him. He is a one-man consensus army. For that matter, check out the edit histories of the articles in question and speak to User:MalikCarr on the subject. Jtrainor 11:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another reply to an edit summary... If you've read the WP:Gundam page, as well as mine and User:MalikCarr's talk pages, you will see that it is not possible to talk to AMIB-- he is a one-man consensus army. He ignores or discounts the opinions of anyone who doesn't agree with him and just does what he wants anyways. Please don't quote WP:AGF at me for this statement either, because it's the plain and simple truth of the matter. AMIB might have good intentions, but his edits in this matter have been extremely destructive and against established consensus. Jtrainor 11:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Zeong

If you're willing to compromise on the article as it is, that's okay with me. Since you seem far more reasonable than AMIB, how would you propose facilitating more "reliable sources" for the article so as that ugly template can be removed? I made a lengthy proposition on that regard to AMIB a while ago, which he ignored. You can find it on the article's talk page, as well as one of our tirades on the WP:Gundam discussion page (I think this is when he accused me of being a troll). MalikCarr 08:08, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please desist in your support of AMIB's infobox. This does not have any consensus to be used in place of the existing one and is a source of nothing but contention. Thanks! Kyaa the Catlord 07:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Even Mythsearcher, who sometimes supports some of AMiB's ideas, is against what you are doing in your crusade, suggesting we take an approach closer to that of the JP wikipedia, which if you read his response includes MORE information than we currently do in our infobox. I'm tired of discussing this and will continue rejecting AMiB's infobox. We've discussed this to death previously and came to no consensus to change the infoboxen. Kyaa the Catlord 07:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't build infoboxes, but I'll flat out reject anything AMiB comes up with.... Sorry. Kyaa the Catlord 07:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Sorry if I sound insistent, but I would like to have something productive to look forward to after those articles become unprotected in a few days. Again, I'd be more than happy to have a discourse about the finer points of some of the articles in question without having another pointless edit war on the side. MalikCarr 09:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shu Shirakawa

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shu Shirakawa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This element of the Super Robot Wars series doesn't establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, these are just made up of unnecessary plot summary, game guide material, and original research. Relevant AfDs include Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Database (Super Robot Wars), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arado Balanga, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruach Ganeden and more. All discussions resulted to deletion of the nominated articles.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 13:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Shu Shirakawa

I have nominated Shu Shirakawa, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shu Shirakawa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Magioladitis (talk) 23:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Maikeru. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]