User talk:Mahendrasingh Balot

Welcome!

Hello, Mahendrasingh Balot, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Mahendrasingh Balot (Historian), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 18:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mahendrasingh Balot (Historian)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mahendrasingh Balot (Historian), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Prithviraj Chauhan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Wikipedia is not a place for caste wars: please use other internet forums for caste-related discussions. utcursch | talk 14:50, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Alivardi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Prithviraj Chauhan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Prithviraj Chauhan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 18:00, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just gave the proof from wikipedia itself Mahendrasingh Balot (talk) 18:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CIRCULAR.
Alivardi (talk) 18:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:BRD - if you're making any contentious edits that have been undone earlier, please get consensus on the talk page first. Also, please remember that Wikipedia is not a place to promote your caste. utcursch | talk 18:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where have I promote my Caste,I have given the real proof! People like you are having problems with this caste. Mahendrasingh Balot (talk) 18:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prithviraj chauhan page

Hello Mahendersingh Balot I observe recently u tried to made edit on Prithviraj chauhan page about his Rajput identity or something like this where u were yet to gave a scholary source About that Particular identity well i advice u should edit that page now From a scholary source of Jadunath sarkar a renowned historian about Rajput identity which clearly prove it that it emerge during ghurid invasion In 12th century on pg 32 in first paragraph also there are more proofs in sarkar book that is A history of jaipur about kacchawa when they migrate to Rajpuatana in 12th century,If u want to clear it u can please edit that page along with many pages like Chauhan dynasty and Rajputana one here is the book its scholary and ur change will be accepted most probably.If it helps u its my pleasure.

Jadunath Sarkar (1960). Military History of India. Orient Longmans.

Jadunath Sarkar (1994). A History of Jaipur: C. 1503-1938. Orient Blackswan. ISBN 978-81-250-0333-5.

Pg. 32 of this book 1st paragraph in pecuilar race section u can try with this scholary source.The second book is about Rajputana identity by sarkar in 12th century also include About Prithviraj chauhan's i will suggest u to use these sources to edit that page.Thanks.Dk Lillee 1949 (talk) 06:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will surely and look into this and doing some research for the same topic. Mahendrasingh Balot (talk) 08:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Balot

Hello I gave the link to those sources just because u werr trying to edit those pages using Brittanica refrences without scholary sources I provide u a classical book So that u can edit that page now of Prithviraj chauhan which u were trying to do in May about his identity.I gave the references in last comment with pg numbers now u can edit.Thanks Caliphates 727 (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contacted by sockpuppet

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the accounts that have been messaging you recently, Dk Lillee 1949 and Caliphates 727, are confirmed sockpuppets of User:Showbiz826, who had been blocked for edit warring and block evasion. Due to various page protections and IP blocks, Showbiz826 is unable to make edits themselves on many articles. Instead, they have made several sockpuppets which they use to try to pester other users into implementing their desired edits (see Aspotate Prophet 527, Ennis1849 and The String 20 among others). It is therefore possible that they will contact you again in the guise of a new account. I'll leave it up to you how you decide to deal with this, though I personally believe it is best to just ignore such messages. I hope you find this message useful.
Alivardi (talk) 18:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Vengeance 01 (talk) 12:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I'm leaving this alert on multiple other editors to make sure everyone is aware that editor behavior is closely watched on these articles. Vengeance 01 (talk) 12:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]