User talk:Maharkins

File source problem with File:5K_Night_Run-no_trim_150dpi-200x277.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:5K_Night_Run-no_trim_150dpi-200x277.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 21:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Fox_Tucson_Theatre_Interior1_photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fox_Tucson_Theatre_Interior1_photo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 07:52, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fox Tucson Theatre Interior1 photo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fox Tucson Theatre Interior1 photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Southwestern Art Deco architecture in the Unites States

The article Southwestern Art Deco architecture in the Unites States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is just a copy/paste job from Fox Tucson Theatre, with nothing new, or particularly reliant to the topic described by the article name.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 208.81.184.4 (talk) 00:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fox Tucson Theatre

Please review WP:COI reguarding your edits of Fox Tucson Theatre, as in this edit you claim to be Vice President of the Fox Tucson Theatre Foundation. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A similarity between this user ID and User:Mharkins has been noted. A review of wp:SOCK may be in order. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]