User talk:Mahadoc

Welcome!

Hello, Mahadoc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Amnesty International does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 01:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's really simple: secondary sources do NOT verify a "pro-Kremlin position". That's all opinion, and so you cannot put that in a heading as if it's a fact. If you like, you can argue and edit war over this, but it is not going to go your way. And while we're at it, the idea that an organization would be pro-Kremlin because it criticizes Ukraine is shortsighted and childish. Drmies (talk) 01:16, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi! I wrote about accusations from government officials, not a fact. I've updated the Sub-Heading 1

1) https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-polytics/3543487-disinformation-and-propaganda-podolyak-reacts-to-scandalous-statement-by-amnesty-international.html

2) https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2022/08/4/7361856/ 3) https://english.nv.ua/nation/president-s-office-slams-amnesty-international-for-accusing-ukraine-s-army-of-endangering-civilians-50261023.html Mahadoc (talk) 01:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hi Mahadoc! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Europe discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of unmanned military aircraft of Ukraine moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of unmanned military aircraft of Ukraine. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and insufficient context. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mahadoc. Thank you for your work on Shark (drone). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of unmanned military aircraft of Ukraine

Hello, Mahadoc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of unmanned military aircraft of Ukraine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]