User talk:Magickallwiz

Meraloma Club

Hi, first - I'm going to delete the newly created talk page as there should not be talk pages without a corresponding article. That other pages exist is not a justification against deletion. If the other pages do not meet the notability criteria then they should be nominated for deletion as well as described in the first link above. Tags were added to the Meraloma Club page on a number of occasions as a prompt to try to improve referencing to determine notability but they were either removed without any improvements made to the page or ignored. Camw (talk) 05:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have also deleted the two pages you recreated on the club that were the same as the one deleted before. Please stop doing this as they will be deleted under Criteria for Speedy Deletion:G4. Camw (talk) 05:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Kennedy

Comments like this may be appropriate for the talk page or HTML comments, but should not be visible in the article. Superm401 - Talk 06:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. єmarsee • Speak up! 03:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Winter Olympics

Please don't feel persecuted by your additions to the 2010 Winter Olympics article being reverted The points you are trying to make about may be quite valid, but Wikipedia's requirements are quite strict. See if you can find better references, or post text that better reflects what the references actually say. Good luck. HiLo48 (talk) 05:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from 2010 Winter Olympics. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. єmarsee • Speak up! 20:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. єmarsee • Speak up! 20:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove the <ref> tags for no reason. External links outside of the EL section of an article are generally discouraged. єmarsee • Speak up! 20:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2010 Winter Olympics, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. єmarsee • Speak up! 20:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to 2010 Winter Olympics. Clarince63 (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that, even after the above warning, you have again restored your inappropriate edit to that article, after it has been repeatedly reverted by several editors. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at 2010 Winter Olympics. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy 96 21:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Liz Smart.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Liz Smart.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

Learn how to properly uses references, using square brackets don't count as references. You must use the <ref> tags. єmarsee • Speak up! 06:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Liz Smart.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Liz Smart.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:45, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Elizabeth Smart.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elizabeth Smart.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Liz Smart Sketch.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Liz Smart Sketch.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Elizabeth Smart Sketch.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Elizabeth Smart Sketch.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Magickallwiz. You have new messages at Ww2censor's talk page.
Message added 04:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ww2censor (talk) 04:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another reply. Also please sign by adding four tildes like this ~~~~ to your posts. ww2censor (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Taylor Momsen, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. iGeM iN ix 05:21, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Taylor Momsen has been reverted, as it introduced unsourced or poorly sourced negative or controversial biographical material. Please do not continue to add such information. Thank you. Diannaa ^(Talk) 05:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Steve Jobs, you may be blocked from editing. BashBrannigan (talk) 01:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Citadel Middle School. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 05:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Gordon Campbell, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 05:37, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Casablanca (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flashback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Melissa Rauch, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 04:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Melissa Rauch, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The cite provided does not provide the info you are adding. SummerPhD (talk) 04:22, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your source does not say "Los Angeles, California", "writing partner" or "Winston Beigel". I'll give it a day, then remove it if you can't find and add a reliable source. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the issue at Talk:Melissa_Rauch#Husband. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:14, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Melissa Rauch. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IMDb is not a reliable source for biographical info. As far as I can tell (you didn't cite it), her Facebook page does not mention her husband. SummerPhD (talk) 04:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the issue at Talk:Melissa_Rauch#Husband. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding poorly sourced content and discuss the issue at Talk:Melissa_Rauch#Husband. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Moral hazard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – S. Rich (talk) 01:04, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Citadel Middle School concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Citadel Middle School, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Citadel Middle School

Hello Magickallwiz. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Citadel Middle School.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Citadel Middle School}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]