User talk:Magicalreview

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Magicalreview (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello all i did is asked why 10 additional hours was added to my block? i didnt do anything else. Magicalreview (talk) 03:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Magicalreview (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sent request with complete explanation to unblock to "Response to unblock appeal #30285" received answer from admin 331dot English Wikipedia Administrator to do it here on my page. Please Unblock me, i want to discuss further instructions for my page with my admins. thanks in advance. Magicalreview (talk) 18:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. WP:GAB explains how to write an unblock request. Note that you will lose access to your talk page if you keep on abusing the unblock template in this manner. Yamla (talk) 18:51, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Magicalreview (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Give a good reason for your unblock - i have no intention to post in anyones page except of open conversations that i have with 2 admins for deletion. * Stick to the point - I have no intention to publish my article without Otrs approve & Admin approve. * I Understand that i was blocked because i wrote too many explanations, i will do them shorter and will wait for response. * i am sorry if i misunderstood the policy of wikipedia * i will not write too much until i will recieve exact explanation for what to do next. * Please receive my apologies. Magicalreview (talk) 19:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The more you write the more evident it becomes that you are totally unable to understand why your account is blocked. You are here for promotional purposes, that is why you are blocked from editing, and I cannot begin to understand where on earth you got the idea that you were blocked because you "wrote too many explanations". JBW (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am moving your latest post to its correct chronological place, at the bottom of the page. Putting comments out of order makes it confusing and difficult to follow the sequence of the conversation. JBW (talk) 19:57, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Magicalreview (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This was the last comment i received from my admin "We next wait for the WP:OTRS team to verify your emails, and they should communicate with you if the proof is not appropriate. The OTRS volunteer will then request the restore here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)" * i have no other notification from non of the people that i spoke with about what you say at the moment. * i hear the reason, i understand. i declare i have no intention to promote anything. * how can i clarify that more? please assist. * whats the proper way to prove my point? please assist. Magicalreview (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, user has decided to retire. Yamla (talk) 16:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you want to continue editing Wikipedia, the best way to avoid promotional editing, would be to avoid editing anything connected with you. This would mean that you did not write about "The Yogi Graphic Novel". Instead pick a completely different topic to write about on Wikipedia, or make minor improvements to other pages. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not email me, all communication should stay on-Wiki. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understood have no more questions, i posted retired blank as i have nothing more to add. Magicalreview (talk) 15:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Magicalreview (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have understand that i can not continue work or publish my article "The Yogi Graphic Novel" and i have no intention of doing that.
I want to create another Biography Article
I would like to research and understand Wikipedia Policy and community widely
I want to participate of useful conversations as if will needed
Please allow me to get back Magicalreview (talk) 10:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

At this point your only pathway back to editing would be the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Magicalreview (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i understand that i can not write and publish about "The Yogi Graphic Novel", * i understand that i can not write any subject related to "Shailendra Sharma" * i have no intentions to publish anything at the moment. * Please unblock. Magicalreview (talk) 15:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural per the above decline and decision to remove talk page access. I will also note that there was a half-hearted attempt at a legal threat on the IRC unblock channel this afternoon which would have persuaded me to remove talk page access, had Yamla not already made that block change earlier. Nick (talk) 16:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

Note this user has engaged in attempted block evasion using the meatpuppet, Nickispeaki. --Yamla (talk) 10:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.