User talk:MagicDog2000

December 2017

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ni Hao, Kai-Lan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES SummerPhD^v2.0 02:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Little Bill, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Again, please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. SummerPhD^v2.0 19:31, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at School of Rock (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Disney Junior. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:32, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Disney XD, you may be blocked from editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to VeggieTales does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:31, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hunter Street (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by Nicktoons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Dare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Playhouse Disney. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:37, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Oshwah, I Have read, and understood all the rules and now I understand. Provide Sources, make sure It is a reliable source. And do not Vandalise Which I never have done, and If I did, It was an accident, MagicDog2000

May 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MagicDog2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I have reviewed the guidelines for proper sourcing Wikipedia:Reliable_sources and how to make citations Wikipedia:Citing_sources. I understand that I was not following the guidelines before, and have asked for the help of another user User:NestedUniverse to review all edits that I make for the next 3 months prior to making them to make sure that I am adding quality changes to Wikipedia. Can you please remove the ban, or give me a roadmap of my next steps? Thanks.

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 13:20, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request Reason: Can you please help me edit a pre existing article? MagicDog2000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MagicDog2000 (talk • contribs)

If you are unable to follow the instructions you've been given, you lack sufficient competence to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 10:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Reason why I can't improve an article is because I'm blocked. Which means getting unblocked will never happen!!! MagicDog2000 16 May 2020

Follow the instructions. We require a level of competence you are completely failing to display here. The instructions are clear. If you are unable to follow them, we have to leave Wikipedia blocked to protect the project against your edits. --Yamla (talk) 11:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to do you say to click the edit tab if I'm having trouble. everytime I click edit, It says YOU ARE BLOCKED IDEFINETLY. You don't understand ANYTHING MagicDog2000

Thanks for letting us know you lack sufficient competence to follow the instructions you've been given. As such, we cannot allow you to be unblocked and therefore, there's no point leaving you with access to this talk page. So I have rectified that. --Yamla (talk) 10:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.