User talk:Madmath789

Welcome!

Hello, Madmath789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

And don't foget, the edit summary is your friend. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 22:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: fine topology

I replied on my talk page. In short, I don't have good ideas, but asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Hopefully somebody will answer. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 23:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The revert

I see that you did not notice that I reverted because there was a blank edit summary – be sure to check that next time. — Brenden h ull (T + C) at 22:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Algorithmic topology; Ḏāl; Maghreb Arabic; Ġayn; Poisson kernel; Moroccan Arabic; Hans Wehr transliteration; Weak operator topology; Standard Arabic Technical Transliteration System; Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi; Upper topology; Algerian Arabic; Abdullah Ibn al-Muqaffa; Ḫāʼ; Ṯāʼ; Ẓāʼ; Homotopical algebra; Vacuum energy

Cleanup: Invariants of tensors; Modern Standard Arabic; Classical Arabic
Merge: Logical biconditional; List of Japanese cities by population; Sino-Korean
Add Sources: Squeeze theorem; Bronzeware script; Volapuk encoding
Wikify: Habib; Wavel Ramkalawan; Constructivist epistemology
Expand: Biang biang noodles; Akkadian language; Islamic art

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please clarify

Lethe - since the time you said you were away, I have seen loads of changes on my watchlist you have made - are you REALLY having a break?!? :-) Madmath789 22:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be more specific? I have taken a look at Special:Contributions/Lethe, and I do not see any edits in my account after I announced my departure on Wednesday. Were the edits problematic? Maybe you confused User:lethe with User:Lenthe or something. -lethe ^{talk +} 21:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to help you, but I HAVE HAD IT WITH WIKIPEDIA!

I will not help with Wikipedia anymore. Whatever I do, the bullies delete. You can email me. email address on my user page. MathStatWoman 20:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Waring's problem

I'm sorry for having misunderstood the intention of O(k) in Wooling's upper bound, so thank you for noticing my edit. As it stood 0 <= O(k) <= ck was, for me, the only logical explanation for the formula. Could you please provide some reference on the page as to what O means in this case, and add it to O as well? Thanks. Davilla 17:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category tags

Hi, MadMath789!

Thanks for the note over on Cauchy-Riemann equations. I was sort of muddle-headed the day I wrote that stuff.

Anyway, I just wanted to mention something. I've been pulling some articles over into my user space to make major edits / expansions. Today I noticed a guideline and read all the way through it for the first time. The guideline suggests that when you have a copy of a live article in your user-space, you put the <nowiki></nowiki> tags around the category tags at the end of the article so your private copy won't end up on a category list that a user might look at while searching a topic. One should take the tags out when putting the article back in the main name-space.

So anyway, I had violated this guideline myself, and went and fixed it up after I read about it. And then when I went to check (via the [Category:Complex analysis] tag) that I had cleaned up after myself, your name popped up as a category! So I invaded your user-space and put the <nowiki></nowiki> tags into your working copy of "Jensen's formula". I hope you don't mind.

Have a great day! ;^> DavidCBryant 22:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phragmén–Lindelöf principle

Hi,

I have made some changes to the article Phragmén–Lindelöf principle (the exponent in the assumption was twice larger the needed, so I relaxed the assumptions, and used the opportunity to state it for arbitrary size of sector, + some cosmetic changes). Could you please have a look, as the last person who made a serious revision?

Thanks, Sasha (talk) 03:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Madmath789.jpg

The file File:Madmath789.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]