User talk:Maddox

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
The ability to start new pages.
The ability to rename pages.
The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
The ability to upload images.
The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
The eligibility to eventually become an administrator.
Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. AdamBiswanger1 02:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion from a veteran WikiProject Comics editor

In the interest of peace and for the overall good of the Project, I'd like to suggest it might be fruitful to open a discussion with User:Fma12 at Talk:Action Comics. Getting a variety of editors' opinions can only be helpful. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Veronica Mars episodes

I've unredirected the various VM episodes, and had a go at sourcing The Wrath of Con to demonstrate why I believe each individual VM episode meets the GNG and deserves to be retained as a separate episode, regardless of their current individual states, which are admittedly not as good as their potential. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 03:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Action Comics #1

Hi I have concerns with NPOV in regards to your edits on action Comics your sources for value on a given condition were questionable. Price guides vary from guide to guide. Overstreet Comic Book Price Guide is probably the most reputed guide which you did not reference and even that it is just guide. Real sales are probably more reliable Amazing Fantasy #15 was the 2nd highest ever paid for a Comic Book behind that rare 8.5 grade action comics. I have concerns of you only listing DC titles as there is a competition between these companies. Fact is Amazing Fantasy 15 sold for more than the DC books. I am reapplying and fixing my edits. Please discuss before deletions. Given condition statement lacks reliable reference, By the way one of your references is outdated, since high value books increase in value very rapidly a reference from 2006 is very dated. Please do not edit war lets discuss. 0pen$0urce (talk) 23:04, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks for your insight, I don't have any vested interest, but I notice a lot of fanboy feuding in things like comic books on here. I just have some knowledge and like to contribute. I was making the point that your quick to delete someones contributions yet not even focus on the exiting content that needs work such as the lousy reference that was 5 years old and from an opinionated online price guide I never heard of. Also please be cordial, your coming off as a excessively assertive and I notice I am not the only contributor to mention Edit War to you. I am going to make a edit of the million dollar record because the previous record it bested was not a lesser condition book of the same and that record was broken by both Amazing fantasy #15 and later 1.5 million 8.5 grade Action 1. I am providing references. --0pen$0urce (talk) 19:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The New 52

WP: POINT Duggy 1138 (talk) 08:48, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers!

Thanks for your very helpful input over at Hellblazer! I'm taking it all into account, and should do a spruce in the next few days on your advice. You can't always see what to do the hundredth time you read something, and you're look see has been really helpful on an article I've put a lot of graft into lately. And to think a week ago I was in disagreement with you over The New 52! Clearly you are an impassioned comics fan, a great linguist, and a credit to WP! Benny Digital ^{Speak Your Brains} 08:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo consensus discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the matter discussed at the bottom of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Maddox. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Maddox. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]